![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
thanks once again murray. =) |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
well since im a complete noob on tags... (reason I started DW) I guess I will have to learn eventualy... So its not possible in design mode, is it....? I made a page containing scrollbars in design mode but if I look at that code, what you guys offered is not there, I assume its entwinged in DW's design itself and not editable unless you work in code mode In design mode you cant see the scrollbars, you just have to assume they are there, If I implement those tags, I probably need to re do the page....? o.O, im suchha noob on code... I used to do basic, tried hexadecimal and went insane, trew the book out of the window that was 1985, working on Commodore and Spectrum... anyway thx |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
created a scroll but cant seem to alter its colour, not able to find it in the bible.. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
but if my site is html4.0 validated, it also means that my site does has a valid doc-type rite? Yes. And it means that by redefining the body tag for the scrollbar, you will not see the style applied. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:15:20 -0400, "Murray *TMM*" forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote: but if my site is html4.0 validated, it also means that my site does has a valid doc-type rite? Yes. And it means that by redefining the body tag for the scrollbar, you will not see the style applied. Not necessarily. A page with the broken DWMX doctype will validate, but it will still throw the browser into quirks mode. Gary |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
The broken doctype validates? Really? |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 12:14:11 -0400, "Murray *TMM*" forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote: The broken doctype validates? Really? See http://tinyurl.com/39jkc Gary |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Holy frijole.... |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |