![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
Just the opposite of half lying?Some statements are more true than others.... Joost Kolkman (who loves shades of grey and refuses to see the world in black and white) |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
I think you'll have to use IFRAMES which will work in IE but not in Mozilla based browsers. I think iframes work in mozilla and ie |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
Don't worry about page loading. If you have the same thing from page to page for navigation, that part doesn't take any downloading time. So just because it is a different page, don't worry about it. |
|
Now, you *can* have navigation not reload. However, this involves frames |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
If the navigation is on every page, it is downloaded with the page unless it is added as an include... The graphics (if you are using them) might be cached or not. |
|
Don't worry about page loading. If you have the same thing from page to page for navigation, that part doesn't take any downloading time. So just because it is a different page, don't worry about it. If the navigation is on every page, it is downloaded with the page unless it is added as an include... The graphics (if you are using them) might be cached or not. Now, you *can* have navigation not reload. However, this involves frames Not necessarily. You can include a file that contains your navigation on each page, as in <!--#include file="/mynavs.htm" --> (or virtual instead of file, depending upon the web server, Ideally, you use the root-relative path structure if you have many directories. You can use a document relative if all files are at the same level in the site). This page will be cached, most likely. It also makes it easier to update the single page of navigation, rather than all pages...and it eliminates the need for frames. However, what you won't have is a menu system that is visible at all times, as it will scroll up. iframes will work, too, but they can be tricky to style and control as far as width, borders and such. You will have to add the style to the pages you put into the iframe--those of the document *with* the iframe will not affect the content of the page *inside* the iframe. You can find out about iframe attributes and such here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/objects/IFRAME.asp Just some suggestions... -- Donna Casey | Web Designer/Developer/Instructor Team Macromedia Dreamweaver & Fireworks | www.macromedia.com/go/team -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Co-Author | Macromedia Studio MX Bible Contributor | Dreamweaver MX Magic Contributor | Fireworks MX Magic |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
my SSI's can't get to its content. So far (knock on wood), that hasn't happened yet. ~e |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
|
Murray won't like my reply to your question, but yes it can be done and no it does not require frames, iframes, or Flash. I do use CSS and server-side includes, however. I did it on http://www.eddiemcham.com/ and it works just fine and dandy. Sure, it's not 100% perfect for 100% of all web users....but then hey, name me one website that is. If this is what you're looking for ~ and you don't mind that it's not the most user-friendly thing in the world ~ then I'd be happy to share with you how I did it. I'd write it down right now, except I'm busy at work at the moment. While it's true what someone else said about using templates and that the common elements do download fairly quickly, I don't like the fact that it has to call the server for all those items. What if your server suddenly goes belly up while you're in the middle of pulling down someone's web pages? You're assuming the user's browser has already cached all those items. Maybe not. You never know. That's why I did my site the way I did. Everything gets loaded only once ~ the only potential problem is if one of my SSI's can't get to its content. So far (knock on wood), that hasn't happened yet. ~e |
#28
| |||
| |||
|
|
How can something be very true? Isn't something either true or not true? |
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
I think it's a terrible solution, personally, but creative. |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |