![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone know where I can find that article that tells why they should not be used? |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Look at the "Frames are your friends" thread to learn why those anti-frame webpages are, pardon my french, a load or horse manure. ![]() "Cuz 3.0" <buzzmaster (AT) noreplybuzzardbrain (DOT) com> wrote in message news:cc1tij$mh1$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com... Anyone know where I can find that article that tells why they should not be used? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Look at the "Frames are your friends" thread to learn why those anti-frame webpages are, pardon my french, a load or horse manure. ![]() "Cuz 3.0" <buzzmaster (AT) noreplybuzzardbrain (DOT) com> wrote in message news:cc1tij$mh1$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com... Anyone know where I can find that article that tells why they should not be used? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Agreed And for those people who think framed sites can't do well on search engines, some of my best performing sites are framed. You just need to do a bit of research Ultimately, a web page is a web page, irrespective of whether or not it's in a frame. Pete "Jon Yeager" <nospam (AT) please (DOT) com> wrote in message news:cc1to8$mmn$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com... Look at the "Frames are your friends" thread to learn why those anti-frame webpages are, pardon my french, a load or horse manure. ![]() "Cuz 3.0" <buzzmaster (AT) noreplybuzzardbrain (DOT) com> wrote in message news:cc1tij$mh1$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com... Anyone know where I can find that article that tells why they should not be used? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |