Thats complete rubbish, no offence.
Detection is usefull for many things.
eg. a large corporate network doesnt update their plugins unless they
are either told to by their users or dont realise that they need to.
So detection gives a user a prompt to update/install a plugin, and
they forward this to their network admin.
This is obviously the mentality that if it works on my computer it
will on everyone elses, which is unprofessional and bad form.
Due to the large combination of browsers, operating systems and
devices that can now display flash content detection is an absolute
must, not something that you bursh under the carpet because you dont
or wont understand how or why it can/should be used.
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:12:41 +0000 (UTC), "nekkochan"
<webforumsuser (AT) macromedia (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
Yeah, 98% is a bit high. It's actually "only" 97.4%. I assume the
failing 2.6% are the ones you just mentioned. ;-)
Whatever. :-)
Gary
and so we return to my point, which is this: the overwhelming majority of all
users already have the player,
and the measly 2.6 percent who don't arent very bloody likely to install it.
so, they arent' going to see your media ANYWAY, which once again begs the
question:
what on earth do you need to "detect" for? |