![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Jordan, There are quite a few opinions on this. You can check out a good number of them here (watch the wrap): http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=mysql+vs.acces |
|
Best regards, Chris |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Jordan, There are quite a few opinions on this. You can check out a good number of them here (watch the wrap): http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=mysql+vs.acces |
|
Best regards, Chris |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On a subnote, a lot of the posts from there say that access is fine for small sites and stuff. Does anyone know the limitations, how many connections, size, and stuff? Jordan "Chris In Madison" <cowens (AT) cnwGOAWAYDIRTYRATSPAMMERS (DOT) com> wrote in message news:bf3k4t$13v$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com... Hi Jordan, There are quite a few opinions on this. You can check out a good number of them here (watch the wrap): http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=mysql+vs.acces s&btnG=Google+Search Best regards, Chris |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
There is a lot of debate on this. Urban lengend is that officially it is supposed to support up to 256 simulateous connections, but there have been reports of it starting to have problems as low as 10 simulateous connections. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |