HighDots Forums  

Metatag Protocol question from newbie

Macromedia Dreamweaver Macromedia Dreamweaver Discussions (macromedia.dreamweaver)


Discuss Metatag Protocol question from newbie in the Macromedia Dreamweaver forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
John
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Metatag Protocol question from newbie - 07-14-2003 , 11:48 AM






OK, thanks Murray. I'll try that.
I've actually used frames without problems up til now. This site I just
built is modeled after my own sites from a few years ago, with the same
3-frame set up.
I've never had a problem with it.
I guess the only thing that scares me in this case is that it is for a
client.
I'm wondering if I should postpone the launch date and start over.

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
John:

Depending on your expertise and the size of the site, I would use the
frames' pages to build a template, and copy and paste content into spawned
child pages.

Frames will be a nightmare for you....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY TO GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beuhfa$f83$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Great! These look like useful sites.

Well, having just completed a large site based on a 3-frame per page
concept, I'm bummed.
Each page has a left hand navigation bar, along with a sub-navigation
bar
at
the top that opens for each of the links from the left bar.
Is there some relatively easy way to de-frame it?
What would I do, put it all into tables, instead?

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:beuh2a$eal$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

SE issues are the very smallest of the monsters that come with frames.
To
read more go here -

http://apptools.com/rants/framesevil.php

Go here and read to find out more about how to manage SE spiders -

http://spider-food.net

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beugsa$dv3$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Yikes!
This opens up a whole other can of worms for me.
It's finally beginning to sink in what a problem frames can be, i.e.
search
engines taking searchers to one particular frame of one of my
3-frame
pages.
Well, that's an issue for another day.

For now, other than meta-tags, what is the best way of making sure
that
searchers find my site?

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:beufsr$bpk$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

Yes - that's what I mean. The SE's now use quite sophisticated
algorithms
for parsing the page's importance and content from the readable
information
on the page, the use of <h1>, <h2>, <strong>, alt tags, image file
names,
location on the page, etc., etc., etc. Meta tags become quite
useless
in
this context, since you can put anything you want in the meta tags
with
no
regard for page content.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY
TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM)
Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beufma$bd8$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Huh? I realize that the porn industry has always been at the
forefront
of
pushing the envelope on the web. But isn't the demise of
metatags
a
step
backwards?
Unless, you're suggesting that things have advanced so far that
they're
just
not necessary anymore. Is that what you mean?

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in
message
news:beuelf$94t$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

You have the porn industry to thank for the 'deprecation' of
the
meta
tag.
I frankly don't think your content in those areas will make
any
difference
at all....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST
WAY
TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials &
Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM)
Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beue34$7tu$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Wow! I'm amazed.
Well, is there any reason NOT to use them?
I'm thinking if there's no downside and a potential
additional
benefit
to
using them, that I still will.
Would that be a mistake?
The last "magic number" I remember hearing from a few year
ago
was
7,
as
being the number of times not to exceed on any particular
tag
before
it
would become self-defeating. Is that still true?

Thanks.

John


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in
message
news:beual9$m7$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

They are not used much anymore. The content and
arrangement
of
information
on the page is much more important.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE
BEST
WAY
TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials &
Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials &
Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia
(MM)
Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beu8bf$pi0$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
I've been away from web design for awhile and coming
back
into
it.
What is the present protocol for metatags? As I recall
there
was
a
magic
not-to-exceed number of times that a word or phrase
could
appear
on
any
given page before it would become an issue with the
search
engines.
Also, if there's any general overview site someone could
point
my
too
regarding metatags, I'd appreciate it.
I've just searched the archives here, and much to my
surprise
I
found
nothing.
Maybe they're not used anymore.........?
Thanks
John
























Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Murray *TMM*
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Metatag Protocol question from newbie - 07-14-2003 , 05:22 PM






John:

Read that rant about frames. You decide.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY TO GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================

"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
OK, thanks Murray. I'll try that.
I've actually used frames without problems up til now. This site I just
built is modeled after my own sites from a few years ago, with the same
3-frame set up.
I've never had a problem with it.
I guess the only thing that scares me in this case is that it is for a
client.
I'm wondering if I should postpone the launch date and start over.

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:beuhi6$fd1$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

Depending on your expertise and the size of the site, I would use the
frames' pages to build a template, and copy and paste content into
spawned
child pages.

Frames will be a nightmare for you....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beuhfa$f83$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Great! These look like useful sites.

Well, having just completed a large site based on a 3-frame per page
concept, I'm bummed.
Each page has a left hand navigation bar, along with a sub-navigation
bar
at
the top that opens for each of the links from the left bar.
Is there some relatively easy way to de-frame it?
What would I do, put it all into tables, instead?

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:beuh2a$eal$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

SE issues are the very smallest of the monsters that come with
frames.
To
read more go here -

http://apptools.com/rants/framesevil.php

Go here and read to find out more about how to manage SE spiders -

http://spider-food.net

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY
TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM)
Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beugsa$dv3$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Yikes!
This opens up a whole other can of worms for me.
It's finally beginning to sink in what a problem frames can be,
i.e.
search
engines taking searchers to one particular frame of one of my
3-frame
pages.
Well, that's an issue for another day.

For now, other than meta-tags, what is the best way of making sure
that
searchers find my site?

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:beufsr$bpk$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

Yes - that's what I mean. The SE's now use quite sophisticated
algorithms
for parsing the page's importance and content from the readable
information
on the page, the use of <h1>, <h2>, <strong>, alt tags, image
file
names,
location on the page, etc., etc., etc. Meta tags become quite
useless
in
this context, since you can put anything you want in the meta
tags
with
no
regard for page content.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST
WAY
TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM)
Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beufma$bd8$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Huh? I realize that the porn industry has always been at the
forefront
of
pushing the envelope on the web. But isn't the demise of
metatags
a
step
backwards?
Unless, you're suggesting that things have advanced so far
that
they're
just
not necessary anymore. Is that what you mean?

--
John Flaherty


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in
message
news:beuelf$94t$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

You have the porn industry to thank for the 'deprecation' of
the
meta
tag.
I frankly don't think your content in those areas will make
any
difference
at all....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE
BEST
WAY
TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials &
Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials &
Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM)
Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beue34$7tu$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Wow! I'm amazed.
Well, is there any reason NOT to use them?
I'm thinking if there's no downside and a potential
additional
benefit
to
using them, that I still will.
Would that be a mistake?
The last "magic number" I remember hearing from a few year
ago
was
7,
as
being the number of times not to exceed on any particular
tag
before
it
would become self-defeating. Is that still true?

Thanks.

John


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in
message
news:beual9$m7$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
John:

They are not used much anymore. The content and
arrangement
of
information
on the page is much more important.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver -
THE
BEST
WAY
TO
GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template
Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials &
Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials &
Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia
(MM)
Technotes
==================


"John" <john.flaherty1 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:beu8bf$pi0$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
I've been away from web design for awhile and coming
back
into
it.
What is the present protocol for metatags? As I recall
there
was
a
magic
not-to-exceed number of times that a word or phrase
could
appear
on
any
given page before it would become an issue with the
search
engines.
Also, if there's any general overview site someone
could
point
my
too
regarding metatags, I'd appreciate it.
I've just searched the archives here, and much to my
surprise
I
found
nothing.
Maybe they're not used anymore.........?
Thanks
John


























Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.