![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
What about installing Studio MX 2004 on just one machine and installing Dreamweaver 4 / Fireworks 4 on another computer? I'm thinking that since I upgraded, instead of installing the new suite on two computers, I'll install it on one and put Dreamweaver 4 on the computer in the other bedroom for my friend. Well, technically, the point of installing Studio (or portions of Studio) on two machines isn't to give two users access to the same suite of applications. Both installations should be used by the same user. An acceptable scenario would be to install Studio on a desktop and a laptop with both machines owned and used by a single user, or licensee. Make sense? Christian |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
Given that you are allowed to do this I do not see the point of installing the older version. |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
In news:macromedia.dreamweaver, "Paul Whitham TMM" <paul (AT) valleybiz (DOT) net posted on Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:07:16 +1200: Given that you are allowed to do this I do not see the point of installing the older version. Okay. I might install Front Page Express for him or something. :-) |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
I can upgrade my MS Office from Office 95 to Office XP but I can't upgrade my Dreamweaver 3 to Dreamweaver MX without paying nearly $1,000 for a full version as opposed to just over $500 for the upgrade. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |