![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm aware it's possible in Contribute, but Contribute doesn't provide what I want in other areas (Design Time Style Sheets, preventing display of included files). |
|
I'm currently trying to put together an XHTML/CSS template in DreamWeaver. I want to give the editors a number of editable areas, but have them restricted to using a specified CSS when formatting the text within these areas - and not create their own/use unspecified html tags. Does anyone know if this is possible? I'm aware it's possible in Contribute, but Contribute doesn't provide what I want in other areas (Design Time Style Sheets, preventing display of included files). |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
XHTML - because that was the specification laid down to me, |
|
Contribute doesn't (I believe) enable me to prevent the display of included files within the page - something that DreamWeaver does. Nor does it (again I believe) enable use of Design Time Style Sheets. |
|
XHTML - because that was the specification laid down to me, Contribute doesn't (I believe) enable me to prevent the display of included files within the page - something that DreamWeaver does. Nor does it (again I believe) enable use of Design Time Style Sheets. One of which I'll need if I'm to get around a problem rendering a menu. Dreamweaver enables me to do these, but not apparently the locking of style tags to those I specify - something Contribute does offer. I'm trying to pick a package that will give me what I need, but compromise looks like it's needed... |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for your tips. XHTML is a benefit in this case (perhaps not in DreamWeaver) to the institution, as they may want to harvest the content... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |