![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am trying to load two html docs into two different frames. I basically want to have a user click on a button in the left frame and then have a different menu appear in that left frame and also have a page load in the main frame. All I seem to be able to do is load to one frame at a time. Any suggestions??:confused; |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yes. Dump the frames. You can do what you want, but consider this. You click a link and the right frame loads the new page then the left page loads the new navigation. Now, I decide to click the browser's back button. Oops -the left navigation page changes back, and you have just won yourself a fast track ticket to frameset hell. Wanna go there? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Murray *TMM* wrote: Yes. Dump the frames. You can do what you want, but consider this. You click a link and the right frame loads the new page then the left page loads the new navigation. Now, I decide to click the browser's back button. Oops -the left navigation page changes back, and you have just won yourself a fast track ticket to frameset hell. Wanna go there? use nested framesets, no problems with backbuttons. make a few framesets that contain the two frames you lik to cange with one click make your navigation link to these framesets and you are up and running. Joost Kolkman |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Here we go again. Joost, it's OK for you to do that because you understand frames and their associated problems. Consider the experience level of those who ask such questions. Now, since you are the only one who visits here (irregularly) with such advice, and since following such advice is bound to raise issues for the poster, who will support them? Get pragmatic, dude. Your advice does them no favors. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
See no problem in giving a beter answer to the problem when asked. |
|
Everytime I read an advice to use javascript to change two frames at one click I see the answer that the back button won't work propperly. Which is true. See no problem in giving a beter answer to the problem when asked. Let them read the rants of frames, that is a good thing. Let them decide how important the problems are for their website. Let them read the possible solutions and see if they are capable of understanding. But don't say frames are wrong by giving the second best answer and than saying this answer is not good enough... Every designer should master his tools step by step; frames are just one of them. Joost Kolkman (I am not the only on here, but with all the frame-bashing around not everyone dares to speak) Murray *TMM* wrote: Here we go again. Joost, it's OK for you to do that because you understand frames and their associated problems. Consider the experience level of those who ask such questions. Now, since you are the only one who visits here (irregularly) with such advice, and since following such advice is bound to raise issues for the poster, who will support them? Get pragmatic, dude. Your advice does them no favors. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
See no problem in giving a beter answer to the problem when asked. It's your opinion that it's better, and you are right to express it. It's my opinion that it's not better, however. It's only another option. Yet it's one that is likely to mislead the original poster into committing to a path he/she doesn't fully understand. By following your suggestion, they may well arrive at a point where they decide to continue NOT because it's a better path, but because they have sunk so much time into the process that they cannot afford to re-trench. It would be the functional equivalent of recommending that someone use the pop-up menu option. Please use frames until you are blue in the face. Please advocate their use on this forum, if you wish. Please contribute your understanding of them to posts where people are struggling with frame-specific problems. But please don't promote them as 'the best solution' because they usually are not. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |