HighDots Forums  

links on an image

Macromedia Dreamweaver Macromedia Dreamweaver Discussions (macromedia.dreamweaver)


Discuss links on an image in the Macromedia Dreamweaver forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old   
SSA786
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: links on an image - 08-07-2004 , 03:51 PM






thanks for the help guys, iv decided not make a splash page after all ...hehehe

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old   
A.H.O.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: links on an image - 08-07-2004 , 04:01 PM






You're killin' me! lol

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old   
rrose selavy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: links on an image - 08-07-2004 , 06:44 PM



Quote:
Hmm? Especially dial-up users can profit from progressive encoding.
Not so much when it's a huge image like this ... then the user has to look
at the first stage of a very poorly rendered image ... then the second ...
etc. until the whole image is downloaded.

In IE it makes it so that nothing appears until the entire image has
download ... perhaps giving the impression that nothing is happening ...
especially in this case of such a large image.
A non-progressive JPG will at least start to fill the page, top to bottom
allow the user to see how incredibly slow this process is in this case.





Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old   
Michael Fesser
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: links on an image - 08-07-2004 , 07:06 PM



.oO(rrose selavy)

Quote:
To
complicate matters further it's a progressive jpeg so when it first loads in
browers that will display the progressions while loading, the image is
degraded further while the users on dial-ups wait a long time for this huge
image to load and finally be presented 'whole.'
Hmm? Especially dial-up users can profit from progressive encoding.

Quote:
In Internet Explorer (where jpg progression is not supported) users will
just have to stare at a blank table frame for a long time waiting for the
image to appear.
Even if IE doesn't support progressive encoding doesn't mean that it's
completely useless. Recent browsers support it and allow the user to get
an impression of an image right after the first few downloaded bytes.

Quote:
if i remake the pic to have enter in it ..how would i make that into a
link..?

By adding a hotspot to the "enter' portion and linking the site URL to it,
but probably no one is going to wait that long anyway.
ACK

Micha


Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old   
Murray *TMM*
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: links on an image - 08-07-2004 , 08:55 PM



I never saw one that offered any benefit to anybody.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================

"Michael Fesser" <netizen (AT) gmx (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
.oO(rrose selavy)

To
complicate matters further it's a progressive jpeg so when it first loads
in
browers that will display the progressions while loading, the image is
degraded further while the users on dial-ups wait a long time for this
huge
image to load and finally be presented 'whole.'

Hmm? Especially dial-up users can profit from progressive encoding.

In Internet Explorer (where jpg progression is not supported) users will
just have to stare at a blank table frame for a long time waiting for the
image to appear.

Even if IE doesn't support progressive encoding doesn't mean that it's
completely useless. Recent browsers support it and allow the user to get
an impression of an image right after the first few downloaded bytes.

if i remake the pic to have enter in it ..how would i make that into a
link..?

By adding a hotspot to the "enter' portion and linking the site URL to
it,
but probably no one is going to wait that long anyway.

ACK

Micha



Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old   
Michael Fesser
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: links on an image - 08-08-2004 , 12:33 AM



.oO(rrose selavy)

Quote:
A non-progressive JPG will at least start to fill the page, top to bottom
allow the user to see how incredibly slow this process is in this case.
OK, I see what you mean. So while progressive JPEGs are quite useful in
other browsers, they may become a usability problem in IE. Damnit.

Micha


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.