image protection

I now have permission for copyrighted images. Is there a way to stop visitor
from using screen capture to get the image. I know there is a monthly pay for
service from HTMLBlock.co.uk. Is there anything else? or, as I have read
elsewhere: if you post it, kiss it good bye, in regards to protection? If
someone is intent on getting the image, he WILL get it?

Karl,London

On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:42:18 -0700, "Walt F. Schaefer"
<walt (AT) waltswebworx (DOT) com> wrote:

digging a specific image out of the hundreds or thousands of downloaded
(temp) files would be a pain, but possible nonetheless.

Not so tough. Just empty your cache, browse to the page, and all you
have are the handful of files for that page. Or, while the page is
displayed, just click File->Save As. Or hit Print Screen. Or turn off
JavaScript, right click, Save Image. Honestly, there are way too many
ways to easily get images.

Gary

Thanks, guys.... will inform the copyright holder accordingly...
Karl

I know there is a monthly pay for
service from HTMLBlock.co.uk.

ahahahaha! Seriously? Man...that's a good scam.

Anyways, remember the copyright is a legal concept. It has nothing to do
with technology.

-Darrel

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:23:54 +0000 (UTC), "Karlhevera"
<webforumsuser (AT) macromedia (DOT) com> wrote:

I know there is a monthly pay for
service from HTMLBlock.co.uk.

Just in case you haven't gotten the message thoroughly pounded into
your head, there is something that you should know about the above
mentioned encryption. It makes your site *completely* transparent to
search engines and *completely* unusable by anyone who does not have a
JavaScript enabled browser.

Gary

Actually, it would make your site completely opaque to search engines, no?
8)

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
==================


"Gary White" <reply (AT) newsgroup (DOT) please> wrote

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:23:54 +0000 (UTC), "Karlhevera"
webforumsuser (AT) macromedia (DOT) com> wrote:

I know there is a monthly pay for
service from HTMLBlock.co.uk.

Just in case you haven't gotten the message thoroughly pounded into
your head, there is something that you should know about the above
mentioned encryption. It makes your site *completely* transparent to
search engines and *completely* unusable by anyone who does not have a
JavaScript enabled browser.

Gary

I've never been sure what "opaque" really means. It has sometimes made
buying the right pantyhose a problem. :-D

--
Patty Ayers | www.WebDevBiz.com
Free Articles on the Business of Web Development
Web Design Contract, Estimate Request Form, Estimate Worksheet
--

"Murray *ACE*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote

Actually, it would make your site completely opaque to search engines, no?
8)

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
==================


"Gary White" <reply (AT) newsgroup (DOT) please> wrote in message
news:5ccc741t4o0lk9qluo7205tv6d4nj92cnf (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:23:54 +0000 (UTC), "Karlhevera"
webforumsuser (AT) macromedia (DOT) com> wrote:

I know there is a monthly pay for
service from HTMLBlock.co.uk.

Just in case you haven't gotten the message thoroughly pounded into
your head, there is something that you should know about the above
mentioned encryption. It makes your site *completely* transparent to
search engines and *completely* unusable by anyone who does not have a
JavaScript enabled browser.

Gary

LOL. Yeah - I've had that problem too. NOT.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
==================


"P@tty Ayers ~ACE" <signup1REMOVE (AT) ayersvirtualREMOVE (DOT) com> wrote

I've never been sure what "opaque" really means. It has sometimes made
buying the right pantyhose a problem. :-D

--
Patty Ayers | www.WebDevBiz.com
Free Articles on the Business of Web Development
Web Design Contract, Estimate Request Form, Estimate Worksheet
--

"Murray *ACE*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:g55clf$elh$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Actually, it would make your site completely opaque to search engines,
no? 8)

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
==================


"Gary White" <reply (AT) newsgroup (DOT) please> wrote in message
news:5ccc741t4o0lk9qluo7205tv6d4nj92cnf (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:23:54 +0000 (UTC), "Karlhevera"
webforumsuser (AT) macromedia (DOT) com> wrote:

I know there is a monthly pay for
service from HTMLBlock.co.uk.

Just in case you haven't gotten the message thoroughly pounded into
your head, there is something that you should know about the above
mentioned encryption. It makes your site *completely* transparent to
search engines and *completely* unusable by anyone who does not have a
JavaScript enabled browser.

Gary

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:16:29 -0400, "Murray *ACE*"
<forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote:

Actually, it would make your site completely opaque to search engines, no?
8)

Hmmm ... If something is transparent, you cannot see it, right? If it
were opaque, you could see it. ;-)

Perhaps stating it this way will provide less ambiguity. If you use
that "encryption" scheme, search engines will not see anything in your
site and web searches will never find your site.

Gary

I look at it this way - if it's transparent you can see INTO it. If it's
opaque you're screwed. But that's just me. 8)

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
==================


"Gary White" <reply (AT) newsgroup (DOT) please> wrote

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:16:29 -0400, "Murray *ACE*"
forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote:

Actually, it would make your site completely opaque to search engines, no?
8)

Hmmm ... If something is transparent, you cannot see it, right? If it
were opaque, you could see it. ;-)

Perhaps stating it this way will provide less ambiguity. If you use
that "encryption" scheme, search engines will not see anything in your
site and web searches will never find your site.

Gary