![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I would appreciate assistance in resolving a rollover problem which exists only in all versions of IE but works fine in FF, Opera, Safari, and Chrome. You can see the page at http://www.moriel.org/Moriel_USA/Moriel_USA.html. This is a frameset where the rollover menu in the left sidebar automatically loads the page in the main section to the right. In IE it loads the rollover on the wrong line (1 below where it should be) but still correctly loads the page on the right. I'm sure I'm not the first to experience this but just can't seem to locate the solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks! |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Pardon me for saying this but that is simply an awful way to make a website. It suffers from all of the usual disadvantages of frames (there is no reason at all for using them here), in addition to the fact that each rollover required an entirely new page to load in the central frame (i.e., long - LONG - delay). In addition, your use of Java on one of the pages ensures that a great many of your visitors will not see the contents there. That, combined with your use of an all javascript menu in the top navigation frame - script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript1.2" src="../Scripts/MainNav.js"></script means that your site won't be spidered at all. Sorry - but I think your site layout architecture defeats the very purpose of the site. I don't see any rollover problem in IE7. I must agree with Murray with the added caveat: |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
In reading another site I resolved the issue so I'll post it here just in case anyone does the same thing in the future. When naming each rollover they need to be numbered beginning with "0" instead of being given unique names in the "Image Name" filed of the "Insert Rollover Image" dialog box. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
That's nonsense. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:32:19 -0500, "Murray *ACE*" forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote: That's nonsense. You are correct. However, using names with spaces in them will reek havoc with them. Gary |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:32:19 -0500, "Murray *ACE*" forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote: That's nonsense. You are correct. However, using names with spaces in them will reek havoc with them. Gary Not really. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
I just replicated this EXACT solution on 6 additional pages which all now work. And I didn't have spaces in the names to begin with, but did have an underscore. Hope this helps... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |