![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Making it seem more complicated than it is. |
Hi Alan, Thanks for the encouragement ![]() From what I can tell, "Defining a Site in Dreamweaver", is actually just moving (ftp) or (browse local) to a site file's main folder. According to the book I'm reading "How To Do Everything with Dreamweaver 8), the only difference between doing this manually through Windows or IPSwitch, is that when I do it through Dreamweaver's File Manager window, it enables DW to store info about the site and help with updates to links and synchronization... That seems handy enough, justa little confusing because they call it "Defining a Site" and call it a process... Making it seem more complicated than it is. Perhaps instead of the cute DW nomenclature, if they just stuck to "File Management" it would be easier to digest or assimilate. To better understand my perspective, (if you want), of my Dreamweaver hurdles, it would probably be helpful for you to check out homestead's LPX sitebuilder. It's wayyyyyyy easier and nearly as powerful for static sites. It's free but proprietary software though, so to try it one needs to sign-up for a free homestead account. Upon account creation, one is forced into selectinga "QuckSite" which is a point and click template system, but you can easily delete that site and start from scratch with the downloadable SiteBuilder LPX. All my sites I have done from scratch. It's so easy to use that you can literally design as quick as you can think creatively. It's a WYSIWYG that you truly do get what you see... No matter which browser. This migration to Dreamweaver is tough because their WYSIWYG was so darn easy. You would have to try it to appreciate it. It handles layers and CSS automatically and when it comes to inserting things like text and images, it makes it a one step process instead of the multi-step process in dreamweaver. Simple common sense like having the properties editor always open and parked on the right side of the screen in vertical fashion makes it easy, because no matter what you click on, the properties editor displays the attributes for reference or editing. Being on the right side of the screen enables you to still see the vertical design view of page (which is handy because wep-pages are vertical so it's best not to block the vertical view). Simple things like being able to drag boxes to select items and grouping them etc is a breeze. Anyway... If you try it, you'll see what I mean. It's like Dreamweaver but without having to understand and manipulate what it's doing. It has a very similar GUI and also has a File Manager view, etc. IF someone crafty figure out a way to copy their idea and make it a stand alone HTML editor / site creator-manager they'd be a millionaire or billionaire. Right now the only way to use LPX is with Homestead, (while open, or as long as Internet connection is live, it maintains constant contact with the mothership). It does all the synchronizing and page duplications (local, remote and preview), behind the scenes without intervention). Try it.... You'll see why I'm so flabergasted at Dreamweaver's lack of usability... It's like the difference between pick-up trucks or SUVs with and without "On the Fly 4x4"... Remember when people used ot have to get out of their 4x4 and struggle with switching the front axle hub manually from 2 WD to 4WD? Now, people are just used to doing it with a button on the dashboard, or it happpens automatically of the vehicle senses wheel spin. That's the difference between LPX and Dreamweaver. LPX is light years ahead in terms of simply "using" the software instead of having to understand what it's doing and manually do everything. For now, I'm stuck. There's no turning back, so I'm forced to learn Dreamweaver which is drastically cutting into my production and pocket book. Perhaps one day, if I can learn how to use it productively, it'll benefit me more than LPX because it offers dynamic site creation capability... But until then, trying to just use it for static site creation and maintenance is laugable - even hysterical step backward for me.... Gotta give credit to DW's marketing team! [q]Originally posted by: Newsgroup User You are concerned with where the properties panel is, but don't understand how to define a site. plonk -- Alan Adobe Community Expert, dreamweaver http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/ [/q] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |