KJo:
Netscape4x will not put scrollbars in layers, and the Mac seems reluctant to
do it properly, as I recall. Anyhow, scrolling content is usually overused
anyhow since it prints poorly and is often a chest-thump rather than a
really useful page element (in my opinion).
A dHTML scroller will work because it depends only on javascripting to move
layers, i.e., there is no 'scrolling' at all. What is happening is that a
layer under another layer is being moved below the upper layer's clip
region. Content in the layer below that falls outside of the clip area is
hidden as a result, and the appearance is as if the content was 'scrolling'.
--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY TO GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.DreamweaverFAQ.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"KJo" <webforumsuser (AT) macromedia (DOT) com> wrote
Quote:
Murray: Which browsers do/don't support layer scroll bars? Is there a
better way of having a large volume of text contained in a small area
|
controlled by scroll bars? I prefer not to use frames.
Quote:
Marja: I'm new to dreamweaver and dhtml. Why would a commercial dhtml
scroller be more likely to be supported by browsers?
Thanks to you both for your help so far. |