HighDots Forums  

CSS vs Tables

Macromedia Dreamweaver Macromedia Dreamweaver Discussions (macromedia.dreamweaver)


Discuss CSS vs Tables in the Macromedia Dreamweaver forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old   
Murray *TMM*
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-07-2005 , 12:14 PM






Just not in my browser...

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Al Sparber- PVII" <hiding (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Here is a hack-free and more logical way to do multi-column layouts:

Markup:

div id="mainlayout"
column id="c1"
Column 2: main content
/column
column id="c2"
Column 1: left sidebar
/column
row id="wideheading"
A wide heading that spans all columns
/row
column id="c3"
Column 3: right sidebar
/column
/div

The CSS:

#mainlayout {
width: 98%;
min-width: 620px;
max-width: 1000px;
display-columns: c2, c1, c3;
column-gutter: 20px;
}

#c2, #c3 {
width: 160px;
}

#wideheading {
column-span: c1, c2, c3;
}


Works perfectly in a logical place far, far, away...


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling mountain
road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that repairs are
scheduled for next Tuesday".



"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dknt6h$d60$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
and stable road is where youse'll find me :-)

Spoken like a true Noo Yawker....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Al Sparber- PVII" <hiding (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:dknss9$cgl$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dkg0l6$fm4$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
I seem to remember Al saying that 'float' was never meant to be used
to place two <divs> side-by-side. However I have no idea what its
original intended purpose was.


I did say that. The float property was originally purposed to replace
the align attribute. Using it for columnar layout is no less a hack than
using tables for layout.

I definitely don't remember him saying this. One could also say that
float was not intended to make list items line up horizontally, but he
does that.

Yes. And I also use tables sometimes, too. Whatever is the most logical
and stable road is where youse'll find me :-)


I don't think one can *know* what float was intended to do, other than
to allow adjacent content to flow around the element as an island in a
river.

Like setting the align attribute on an image or table used to work :-)


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that repairs
are scheduled for next Tuesday".









Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old   
Al Sparber- PVII
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-07-2005 , 12:19 PM






That's because they never asked me to help with the "standards" :-)


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Just not in my browser...

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Al Sparber- PVII" <hiding (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:dko1pf$lgo$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Here is a hack-free and more logical way to do multi-column layouts:

Markup:

div id="mainlayout"
column id="c1"
Column 2: main content
/column
column id="c2"
Column 1: left sidebar
/column
row id="wideheading"
A wide heading that spans all columns
/row
column id="c3"
Column 3: right sidebar
/column
/div

The CSS:

#mainlayout {
width: 98%;
min-width: 620px;
max-width: 1000px;
display-columns: c2, c1, c3;
column-gutter: 20px;
}

#c2, #c3 {
width: 160px;
}

#wideheading {
column-span: c1, c2, c3;
}


Works perfectly in a logical place far, far, away...


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday".



"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dknt6h$d60$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
and stable road is where youse'll find me :-)

Spoken like a true Noo Yawker....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM)
Technotes
==================


"Al Sparber- PVII" <hiding (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:dknss9$cgl$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dkg0l6$fm4$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
I seem to remember Al saying that 'float' was never meant to be
used to place two <divs> side-by-side. However I have no idea
what its original intended purpose was.


I did say that. The float property was originally purposed to
replace the align attribute. Using it for columnar layout is no
less a hack than using tables for layout.

I definitely don't remember him saying this. One could also say
that float was not intended to make list items line up
horizontally, but he does that.

Yes. And I also use tables sometimes, too. Whatever is the most
logical and stable road is where youse'll find me :-)


I don't think one can *know* what float was intended to do, other
than to allow adjacent content to flow around the element as an
island in a river.

Like setting the align attribute on an image or table used to work
:-)


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday".










Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old   
Murray *TMM*
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-07-2005 , 12:43 PM



I found a browser it actually worked in but then I accidentally deleted it.
Bummer....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Al Sparber- PVII" <hiding (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
That's because they never asked me to help with the "standards" :-)


"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dko25j$m4g$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Just not in my browser...

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Al Sparber- PVII" <hiding (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:dko1pf$lgo$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
Here is a hack-free and more logical way to do multi-column layouts:

Markup:

div id="mainlayout"
column id="c1"
Column 2: main content
/column
column id="c2"
Column 1: left sidebar
/column
row id="wideheading"
A wide heading that spans all columns
/row
column id="c3"
Column 3: right sidebar
/column
/div

The CSS:

#mainlayout {
width: 98%;
min-width: 620px;
max-width: 1000px;
display-columns: c2, c1, c3;
column-gutter: 20px;
}

#c2, #c3 {
width: 160px;
}

#wideheading {
column-span: c1, c2, c3;
}


Works perfectly in a logical place far, far, away...


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that repairs
are scheduled for next Tuesday".



"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dknt6h$d60$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
and stable road is where youse'll find me :-)

Spoken like a true Noo Yawker....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Al Sparber- PVII" <hiding (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:dknss9$cgl$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
"Murray *TMM*" <forums (AT) HAHAgreat-web-sights (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dkg0l6$fm4$1 (AT) forums (DOT) macromedia.com...
I seem to remember Al saying that 'float' was never meant to be used
to place two <divs> side-by-side. However I have no idea what its
original intended purpose was.


I did say that. The float property was originally purposed to replace
the align attribute. Using it for columnar layout is no less a hack
than using tables for layout.

I definitely don't remember him saying this. One could also say that
float was not intended to make list items line up horizontally, but
he does that.

Yes. And I also use tables sometimes, too. Whatever is the most
logical and stable road is where youse'll find me :-)


I don't think one can *know* what float was intended to do, other
than to allow adjacent content to flow around the element as an
island in a river.

Like setting the align attribute on an image or table used to work :-)


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday".












Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old   
James Shook
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-07-2005 , 12:45 PM



Al Sparber- PVII wrote:

Quote:
Barry is a very smart man and put a lot of work into that.
Agreed. He is much missed in these parts. I've never found such a
well-researched and evenhanded discussion of HTML tables anywhere else.

--
James M. Shook
http://www.jshook.com


Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old   
James Shook
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-07-2005 , 12:48 PM



Murray *TMM* wrote:

Quote:
I wish he was still posting here. I have tried several times to correspond
with him but to no avail. I fear the worst....
He was a very active and eloquent participant here a few years back, and
then just seemed to disappear from the face of the earth. Now you've got
me really worried. I'll try getting in touch as well. I do hope he's OK
and has just moved onto other things (our loss but somebody's gain....)

--
James M. Shook
http://www.jshook.com


Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old   
Osgood
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-07-2005 , 01:16 PM



Al Sparber- PVII wrote:

Quote:
I seem to remember Al saying that 'float' was never meant to be used
to place two <divs> side-by-side. However I have no idea what its
original intended purpose was.

I did say that. The float property was originally purposed to replace
the align attribute. Using it for columnar layout is no less a hack than
using tables for layout.

Thanks Al for clearing that up.



Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old   
cindyding0412
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-10-2005 , 02:20 AM



http://cindy0412.drivehq.com/

I know it is simple,and I wonder how to use DW to edit it!

I am a new comer ,thanks for any advice!

Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old   
cindyding0412
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CSS vs Tables - 11-10-2005 , 02:25 AM



What is the advantsge of CSS tableless web?

I want to make my http://www.drivehq.com/file/ShowFolder.aspx?isGallery=true&share=true&shareID= 0&parentID=36026&refID=26601

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.