I think this whole approach is No. 2, if you get my drift! 8)
--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver MX
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
news://forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.dreamweaver - THE BEST WAY TO GET
ANSWERS
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"Osgood" <notavailable (AT) atthisaddress (DOT) com> wrote
Quote:
Murray *TMM* wrote:
Negative z-index is a bad thing. But I didn't use negative z-index, did
I?
No, lol...... but I did, just as an experiment. If you don't use a
negative index the layer sits infront of the text and obscures it, even
though it is No 1 and the wrapper is No 2. |