Re: Object required?

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

groupie wrote:
script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src = "scripts/
You were recommended to remove the `language' attribute, were you not?

Yeah groupie, you should be aware that language="javascript" is the
cause of more problems in javascript than anything else. Almost every
problem I've ever seen resolved was fixed by this being removed. We
should add this as item #1 in the FAQ:

Problem: Anything, Solution: Remove language="javascript" from script.

It's such an annoyance that Safari 3.0, Firefox 3.0 and IE8 have all
decided to throw an exception for any script tag that has
language="javascript" in it. </sarcasm>

On Feb 2, 10:45*pm, Stevo <ple... (AT) spam-me (DOT) com> wrote:

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
groupie wrote:
script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src = "scripts/
You were recommended to remove the `language' attribute, were you not?

Yeah groupie, you should be aware that language="javascript" is the
cause of more problems in javascript than anything else. Almost every
problem I've ever seen resolved was fixed by this being removed. We
should add this as item #1 in the FAQ:

Problem: Anything, Solution: Remove language="javascript" from script.

It's such an annoyance that Safari 3.0, Firefox 3.0 and IE8 have all
decided to throw an exception for any script tag that has
language="javascript" in it. </sarcasm

Stevo, you muppet, learn to read the flow of group discussions as soon
as you take your head out of your ass. That post was from PointedEars.

groupie wrote:

On Feb 2, 10:45 pm, Stevo <ple... (AT) spam-me (DOT) com> wrote:
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
groupie wrote:
script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src = "scripts/
You were recommended to remove the `language' attribute, were you not?
Yeah groupie, you should be aware that language="javascript" is the
cause of more problems in javascript than anything else. Almost every
problem I've ever seen resolved was fixed by this being removed. We
should add this as item #1 in the FAQ:

Problem: Anything, Solution: Remove language="javascript" from script.

It's such an annoyance that Safari 3.0, Firefox 3.0 and IE8 have all
decided to throw an exception for any script tag that has
language="javascript" in it. </sarcasm

Stevo, you muppet, learn to read the flow of group discussions as soon
as you take your head out of your ass. That post was from PointedEars.

This was uncalled for. Stevo's sarcastic comment, however inappropriate in
content, was to my *aside* recommending to remove the `language' attribute,
and so in that sense was appropriate to be posted as a followup like he did.

While that particular recommendation is unlikely to solve your problem, it
was and is good advice nonetheless. Not following it may cause a poster to
be perceived as not being able/willing to follow given advice at all, and so
further dealing with their postings may be deemed a waste of time. Use of
street language as displayed here could then only confirm the correctness of
such an assessment.


Score adjusted

PointedEars

groupie wrote:

On Feb 2, 10:45 pm, Stevo <ple... (AT) spam-me (DOT) com> wrote:
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
groupie wrote:
script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src = "scripts/
You were recommended to remove the `language' attribute, were you not?
Yeah groupie, you should be aware that language="javascript" is the
cause of more problems in javascript than anything else. Almost every
problem I've ever seen resolved was fixed by this being removed. We
should add this as item #1 in the FAQ:

Problem: Anything, Solution: Remove language="javascript" from script.

It's such an annoyance that Safari 3.0, Firefox 3.0 and IE8 have all
decided to throw an exception for any script tag that has
language="javascript" in it. </sarcasm

Stevo, you muppet, learn to read the flow of group discussions as soon
as you take your head out of your ass. That post was from PointedEars.

Groupie, you teletubby, you need to learn to recognize sarcasm

As Thomas said in his response, I was taking a sarcastic dig at him
telling you something that wasn't relevant. So I played the fake
agreeing with him stance. There should be a sarcastic font we can use in
these groups