![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <vmsa22tspdo2siointct4q0j85juft2qf3 (AT) news (DOT) markshouse.net>, Mark Goodge <usenet (AT) listmail (DOT) good-stuff.co.uk> wrote: So does 411. And I get the number a lot quicker than if I used my phone to get onto the internet and browse for someplace to call. That's your choice. But if you were in a foreign country, who would you call? Every time I'm in a foreign country, my hotel concierge has always done the job pretty well. And my phone won't work in foreign countries anyway, so the issue of browsing-by-phone is irrelevant in my case. -A |
#42
| |||
| |||
|
|
The other point is that you and I are probably a bit old for it. For teenagers, who use their phones more for texting than they do for talking, mobile web browsing is the obvious next step. Mark |
#43
| |||
| |||
|
|
I think the taxi might have been a bad example. Let's say you're in a city in your own country, and you're in a motel or somewhere that doesn't have a concierge, and you need to find a pharmacy that's open 24 hours because you ran out of your medication. |
#44
| |||
| |||
|
|
The other point is that you and I are probably a bit old for it. For teenagers, who use their phones more for texting than they do for talking, mobile web browsing is the obvious next step. |
#45
| |||
| |||
|
|
Well, that's interesting. Makes me wonder what the attraction is; nothing on the web is so important that I need to use my phone to access it. I can't imagine a more unpleasant way to browse. |
#46
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:42:33 GMT, Adrienne Boswell arbpen2003 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote: I think the taxi might have been a bad example. Let's say you're in a city in your own country, and you're in a motel or somewhere that doesn't have a concierge, and you need to find a pharmacy that's open 24 hours because you ran out of your medication. Can you show us your search procedure of how you go about that, even on the regular web? Go for Liverpool England. People seem to have great faith in web searches over talking to people for this very local information, despite the fact local search on the web has so far been an abject failure. Also a location based SMS service would likely be easier if you were wanting to develop new services to provide this data. Jim. |
#47
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:19:56 +0000 (UTC), axlq (AT) spamcop (DOT) net (axlq) posted something that included: Well, that's interesting. Makes me wonder what the attraction is; nothing on the web is so important that I need to use my phone to access it. I can't imagine a more unpleasant way to browse. You're in the car, and decide to eat at Rangy Lil's - so you need to call for reservations. Phoning 411 is a buck. Going online to look up the number yourself is not. |
#48
| |||
| |||
|
|
a 1923 Snidley dillythumper |
#49
| |||
| |||
|
|
Just please stop cross-posting. |
#50
| |||
| |||
|
|
Frankly, I still don't see the attraction to mobile phone web browsing. I guess it can be a convenience in some cases, but most of the time I think it would be more efficient to get information other ways. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |