On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Alan J. Flavell wrote:
Quote:
However, text labelled LANG=ps, sd, ur (Pashto, Sindhi, Urdu) should
be displayed _completely_ in the typeface I chose for the Arabic script.
On MS Windows, this might be Tahoma with a rich repertoire of Arabic
glyphs.
OK. Were you happy about the situation with initial, medial, final
and isolated forms, that you were mentioning earlier in relation to
some of these Arabic-based script families? |
No. The problem is more subtle. Suppose I have chosen Arial as my
preferred Western typeface and Tahoma as my preferred Arabic typeface
(on MS Windows). I have text marked with LANG=ps. Then Mozilla will
first apply the Western typeface Arial because the language "ps"
is currently unrecognized. Arial contains letters for the Arabic
language, but not the special Pashto letters. Pashto letters are
therefore taken from Tahoma (?) or Arial Unicode (?) or whatever.
*However, letters from different typefaces do not join.*
You should be able to see this effect on
http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/~flavell/...unidata06.html ;-)
when the glyph for ـ is taken from your Western Typeface
Arial and the glyphs for, say, Urdu (0679, 0688, 0691, 06C1, 06BE)
are taken from some other typeface.
--
Mars, unlike Earth, has no atmosphere.
The Chicago manual of style, 15th ed., p. 362