re: links not aligning right

Thanks John L. Your code did the trick, and the page looks right now.

Sorry to post this as a new thread, but SeaMonkey is not allowing me to
send it as a reply for some stupid reason.

Corey

Corey Walker wrote:

Thanks John L. Your code did the trick, and the page looks right now.

Sorry to post this as a new thread, but SeaMonkey is not allowing me to
send it as a reply for some stupid reason.

We no it didn't this is still the same thread. BTW this reply was via
SeaMonkey. What you did you was reply unquoted from your original
posting. If you want to reply to John post be sure your have it
highlighted in the upper message thread pane when you click the reply
button.

Corey

Also try to correct your signature by preceding it with
[hyphen][hyphen][space][carriage return] as mine is below.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Corey Walker wrote:
Thanks John L. Your code did the trick, and the page looks right now.

Sorry to post this as a new thread, but SeaMonkey is not allowing me
to send it as a reply for some stupid reason.


We no it didn't this is still the same thread. BTW this reply was via
SeaMonkey. What you did you was reply unquoted from your original
posting. If you want to reply to John post be sure your have it
highlighted in the upper message thread pane when you click the reply
button.

No, he didn't. He started a new thread, manually filling out the Subject
header, and when doing so didn't capitalize the first letter of "Re", as
his news client would have had he replied. Had his post been a reply
without quoting, it also would have had a Refernces header.


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org

Blinky the Shark wrote:

Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Corey Walker wrote:
Thanks John L. Your code did the trick, and the page looks right now.

Sorry to post this as a new thread, but SeaMonkey is not allowing me
to send it as a reply for some stupid reason.

We no it didn't this is still the same thread. BTW this reply was via
SeaMonkey. What you did you was reply unquoted from your original
posting. If you want to reply to John post be sure your have it
highlighted in the upper message thread pane when you click the reply
button.

No, he didn't. He started a new thread, manually filling out the Subject
header, and when doing so didn't capitalize the first letter of "Re", as
his news client would have had he replied. Had his post been a reply
without quoting, it also would have had a Refernces header.


Hmm your right the reference links to bot connect up, but strangely

SeaMonkey arrange the message as if it was part of the same thread.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Blinky the Shark wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Corey Walker wrote:
Thanks John L. Your code did the trick, and the page looks right
now.

Sorry to post this as a new thread, but SeaMonkey is not allowing
me to send it as a reply for some stupid reason.

We no it didn't this is still the same thread. BTW this reply was
via SeaMonkey. What you did you was reply unquoted from your
original posting. If you want to reply to John post be sure your
have it highlighted in the upper message thread pane when you click
the reply button.

No, he didn't. He started a new thread, manually filling out the
Subject header, and when doing so didn't capitalize the first letter
of "Re", as his news client would have had he replied. Had his post
been a reply without quoting, it also would have had a Refernces
header.


Hmm your right the reference links to bot connect up, but strangely
SeaMonkey arrange the message as if it was part of the same thread.

That's because it's only using the Subject header to thread, not the
References header, as it should. So, for example, it will assume
(incorrectly) that every post with, for instance, the Subject header

help

is part of the same thread. This is why References headers are superior
for threading -- they distinguish *real* threads. The moz news clients
aren't real sharp; look at how brain-dead their newsgroups filtering is.


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org

Blinky the Shark wrote:

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Hmm your right the reference links to bot connect up, but strangely
SeaMonkey arrange the message as if it was part of the same thread.

That's because it's only using the Subject header to thread, not the
References header, as it should. So, for example, it will assume
(incorrectly) that every post with, for instance, the Subject header

help

is part of the same thread. This is why References headers are superior
for threading -- they distinguish *real* threads. The moz news clients
aren't real sharp; look at how brain-dead their newsgroups filtering is.

I concede your are right, even with my Mnenhy & MessageIDFinder
extensions that improve it, it is just not as good as a dedicated
newsreader. I have a copy of Gravity. I just like the convenience of the
all in one rather than run a separate apps. That is why I prefer
SeaMonkey over the Firefox-Thunderbird combo

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Blinky the Shark wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Hmm your right the reference links to bot connect up, but strangely
SeaMonkey arrange the message as if it was part of the same thread.

That's because it's only using the Subject header to thread, not the
References header, as it should. So, for example, it will assume
(incorrectly) that every post with, for instance, the Subject header

help

is part of the same thread. This is why References headers are
superior for threading -- they distinguish *real* threads. The moz
news clients aren't real sharp; look at how brain-dead their
newsgroups filtering is.


I concede your are right, even with my Mnenhy & MessageIDFinder
extensions that improve it, it is just not as good as a dedicated
newsreader. I have a copy of Gravity. I just like the convenience of
the

As for filtering, which is probably the worst fault of Thunderbird,
Gravity it just about a tie with it. You can filter on three specific
headers, but beyond that, you can only filter on "headers", and rules
you set up in that manner are applied against *all headers of which
Gravity is aware*; i.e., you can't specify *which* headers to apply a
rule to, which is a big capability gap.

all in one rather than run a separate apps. That is why I prefer
SeaMonkey over the Firefox-Thunderbird combo

That may be best for you. As for me, I recognize that while a Swiss
army knife may be okay for the occasional small job, it's not going to
be able to do as well with most of them as the stand-alone purpose-built
tools will.


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org

Blinky the Shark wrote:

As for filtering, which is probably the worst fault of Thunderbird,
Gravity it just about a tie with it. You can filter on three specific
headers, but beyond that, you can only filter on "headers", and rules
you set up in that manner are applied against *all headers of which
Gravity is aware*; i.e., you can't specify *which* headers to apply a
rule to, which is a big capability gap.

Well other than Gravity, what else you you recommend. Now all my Linux
boxes are servers, I am testing out a Ubuntu desktop but since my
experience has been Mandrake|Redhat flavor the Debian taken a little
time to get use to. I think I really prefer KDE over Gnome. I'm still
futzing with the new XP box to get it more like my W2k!

all in one rather than run a separate apps. That is why I prefer
SeaMonkey over the Firefox-Thunderbird combo

That may be best for you. As for me, I recognize that while a Swiss
army knife may be okay for the occasional small job, it's not going to
be able to do as well with most of them as the stand-alone purpose-built
tools will.

Well I usually have several apps open at the same time. True
multitasking so SM is a way to reduce 3 to 1...

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Blinky the Shark wrote:

As for filtering, which is probably the worst fault of Thunderbird,
Gravity it just about a tie with it. You can filter on three
specific headers, but beyond that, you can only filter on "headers",
and rules you set up in that manner are applied against *all headers
of which Gravity is aware*; i.e., you can't specify *which* headers
to apply a rule to, which is a big capability gap.

Well other than Gravity, what else you you recommend. Now all my Linux
boxes are servers, I am testing out a Ubuntu desktop but since my
experience has been Mandrake|Redhat flavor the Debian taken a little
time to get use to. I think I really prefer KDE over Gnome. I'm still
futzing with the new XP box to get it more like my W2k!

Readers are quite personal. Personally, my Top 2 for Linux are slrn
and Pan. I use both. You may have noticed that filtering is important
to me, so I'll note that not only are they very versitile for that, they
share a Score file, here, because neither of them use proprietary
scoring like Gravity and some other readers. As for WMs, I prefer KDE
also, and use it on both my SUSE and Mandrake boxen.

all in one rather than run a separate apps. That is why I prefer
SeaMonkey over the Firefox-Thunderbird combo

That may be best for you. As for me, I recognize that while a Swiss
army knife may be okay for the occasional small job, it's not going
to be able to do as well with most of them as the stand-alone
purpose-built tools will.

Well I usually have several apps open at the same time. True
multitasking so SM is a way to reduce 3 to 1...

I use KDE's multiple desktops, with eight set up. I have enough RAM. I
don't need to worry about how many apps I'm running. Right now I'm
running Kmail, slrn, five instances of vim, the Gimp, Quanta Plus
(HTML/CSS editor and site management), two rxvt consoles, two instances
of Konqueror, and freecell. Normally I'd have a couple of browsers
open, as well (Firefox and Konqueror). These are running on the
appropriate desktops, which are: Online, Graphics, Editing, Website
Maintenance, Office, File Management, CLI and Misc.


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org