HighDots Forums  

Re: how to contain frames using css?

HTML Writing HTML for the Web (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)


Discuss Re: how to contain frames using css? in the HTML forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Adrienne Boswell
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: how to contain frames using css? - 11-17-2007 , 05:42 PM






Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "André Gillibert"
<tabkanDELETETHISnaz (AT) yahodeletethato (DOT) fr> writing in
newsp.t1ybh5ri7pu1mk@andre:

Quote:
I'm perplex at the
clulesness of W3Schools at what HTML is, shown in their XHTML tutorial
introduction and the fact that they use XHTML Transitional served as
text/html.

From the XHTML Quiz:
HTML will be replaced by XHTML
You answered: False
Wrong Answer!

and this:

What is the most common XHTML DTD?
Normal
Frameset
Transitional
Loose

According to them Transitional is the most common (probably true), but
note that Strict is conspicuously missing.

--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share



Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
André Gillibert
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: how to contain frames using css? - 11-17-2007 , 06:09 PM






Adrienne Boswell wrote:

Quote:
From the XHTML Quiz:
HTML will be replaced by XHTML
You answered: False
Wrong Answer!

Are we supposed to have a time machine in the first place?

Quote:
What is the most common XHTML DTD?
Normal
Frameset
Transitional
Loose

According to them Transitional is the most common (probably true)
The best (best doesn't imply good) reference I got is:
<http://triin.net/2006/06/12/HTML#document-types>

It's a bit outdated (June 2006).
The sample set of pages isn't representative of the Web as shown by the
presence of class names specific to a site in the list of most used class
names <http://triin.net/2006/06/12/CSS#class-selectors>. The list of pages
has been selected from the Open Directory Project.
It counts the number of pages, not the number of sites, hence big sites
have more weight.

Even with these bias, XHTML Transitional is probably more used than XHTML
Strict.

Quote:
, but note that Strict is conspicuously missing.

Interesting.

--
If you've a question that doesn't belong to Usenet, contact me at
<tabkanDELETETHISnaz (AT) yahoDELETETHATo (DOT) fr>


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.