Something to laugh?

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...Inline&group=0

Best regards,
Martin

On 5/10/2008 9:08 AM, Martin Schneider wrote:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...Inline&group=0

Best regards,
Martin

Actually, many dynamically generated Web pages -- Google, various news
services, etc -- are non-compliant with the W3C specifications.

--
David Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Have you been using Netscape and now feel abandoned by AOL?
Then use SeaMonkey. Go to <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/>.

David E. Ross wrote:

On 5/10/2008 9:08 AM, Martin Schneider wrote:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...Inline&group=0

Best regards,
Martin

Actually, many dynamically generated Web pages -- Google, various news
services, etc -- are non-compliant with the W3C specifications.

I don't know if OP's humor point was the...what was it, 57 errors...but
over in aww we've seen pages with validation errors in the several
hundreds.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
NEW --> Now evaluating a GG-free news feed: http://usenet4all.se

David E. Ross schrieb:

On 5/10/2008 9:08 AM, Martin Schneider wrote:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...Inline&group=0

Best regards,
Martin

Actually, many dynamically generated Web pages -- Google, various news
services, etc -- are non-compliant with the W3C specifications.

I don't know about all the minor services on the web, but the multi
million dollar giant Google is unable to script compliant HTML???

Best regards,
Martin

Martin Schneider scribed:

David E. Ross schrieb:
On 5/10/2008 9:08 AM, Martin Schneider wrote:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...Inline&group=0

Best regards,
Martin

Actually, many dynamically generated Web pages -- Google, various news
services, etc -- are non-compliant with the W3C specifications.

I don't know about all the minor services on the web, but the multi
million dollar giant Google is unable to script compliant HTML???

I think their philosophy is that if it renders properly in IE/FF/Safari, why

spend the time and money to assure it validates.
--
Ed Jay (remove 'M' to respond by email)

On 05/11/08 01:12 pm, Martin Schneider wrote:

Actually, many dynamically generated Web pages -- Google, various news
services, etc -- are non-compliant with the W3C specifications.

I don't know about all the minor services on the web, but the multi
million dollar giant Google is unable to script compliant HTML???

They do not really care about their motto: "Do no harm."

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

Ed Jay schrieb:

Martin Schneider scribed:

David E. Ross schrieb:
On 5/10/2008 9:08 AM, Martin Schneider wrote:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ww...Inline&group=0

Best regards,
Martin
Actually, many dynamically generated Web pages -- Google, various news
services, etc -- are non-compliant with the W3C specifications.
I don't know about all the minor services on the web, but the multi
million dollar giant Google is unable to script compliant HTML???

I think their philosophy is that if it renders properly in IE/FF/Safari, why
spend the time and money to assure it validates.

Yes, and I think it's a nice try to render this feature filled Web-2.0
page on all this browsers....

Holger