![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
... Yet the DRC, the Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB) and the Royal National Institute for the Deaf (RNID), the supposed standard bearers for website accessibility, continue to fail even the most basic A/AA requirements. ... |
|
[quoted from SiteMorse Press Release that I received today] |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
David Quinton wrote: ... Yet the DRC, the Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB) and the Royal National Institute for the Deaf (RNID), the supposed standard bearers for website accessibility, continue to fail even the most basic A/AA requirements. ... Perhaps a little strong, but not without merit. [quoted from SiteMorse Press Release that I received today] Ooooh, the irony. Pot, Kettle. Nah, that's unfair on the charities. None of them even come close to as disastrous as sitemorse. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Nick Kew wrote: David Quinton wrote: [quoted from SiteMorse Press Release that I received today] Ooooh, the irony. Pot, Kettle. Nah, that's unfair on the charities. None of them even come close to as disastrous as sitemorse. It also gets very interesting. The actual report which slates the DRC and RNIB - the organisation on top is a web design agency called RedAnt - which registered what looks to be a perfect score. Strangely this is the only web design agency on the list. Where it becomes interesting is that RedAnt did the design for the sitemorse website. They even buy the "Sitemorse" adword on google searches. Looking through the site it looks to be optimised for automated checking tools. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |