Re: ampersand in urls when using xhtml 1.0 strict

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Harlan Messinger wrote:

Second, this is very strange because NOT encoding ampersands *is* invalid

No, it isn't. & and & just mean different things.
See the valid page
http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...ampersand.html

--
In memoriam Alan J. Flavell
http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...Alan.J.Flavell

Andreas Prilop wrote:

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Harlan Messinger wrote:

Second, this is very strange because NOT encoding ampersands *is* invalid

No, it isn't. & and & just mean different things.
See the valid page
http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...ampersand.html

Fine. "Second, this is very strange because NOT encoding ampersands *is*
invalid unless they happen to be followed by the name of a character
entity reference*."