![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: There are two other reasons for using UTF-8 that come to my mind: There is one reason *not* to use UTF-8. Browsers usually take the typeface depending on the page's charset. So with charset=iso-8859-5, the page is displayed in the reader's preferred Cyrillic typeface. But with charset=utf-8, the page is displayed in the reader's preferred *Latin* typeface, which might be less suitable. This reason is even more important for Chinese text. |
|
1) Some fairly old browsers handled character references with numbers > 255 incorrectly unless UTF-8 was specified. Actually with number > 127. With charset=iso-8859-5 (for example), Netscape 4 would display Latin-1 letters written as &#number; as question mark (?) because the Cyrillic ISO-8859-5 does not contain Latin-1 letters. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |