centering page

dorayme a écrit :
Please consider purchasing (a steal at

$US12.50), my "How to stop getting sucked in by Zero - how to start
enjoying both positive and negative integers")

Wouldn't you sell Mac Titanium hinges ?
That could be a better help (for me).

--
sm

"prophet" <M_Moyes (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

I have a page that uses 3 frames.
1 left 1 top and 1 main

how do I center the page so that it is in the middle?

Why is it that that if I create yet a different index page, as a single
frame which is centered, and the original index page is inside the frame, it
works???

prophet wrote:

"prophet" <M_Moyes (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:j1yRj.229225$pM4.164979 (AT) pd7urf1no (DOT) ..
I have a page that uses 3 frames.
1 left 1 top and 1 main

how do I center the page so that it is in the middle?


Why is it that that if I create yet a different index page, as a single
frame which is centered, and the original index page is inside the frame, it
works???


I don't know, not a prophet, how about a URL?

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

In article
<f217d695-0892-41af-abc4-78bb9c9db9fb (AT) n1g2000prb (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldoraz (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On Apr 30, 1:42 pm, dorayme
"Jonathan N. Little"

Aw...whail your at it, add 10 more blank frames! I have even seen it
done...gotta love frames....

The trouble with that idea is that you are adding more than is needed to
do a job. In the Framepeace literature we have an article - you can buy
it* without joining. We recommend not to multiply frames beyond
necessity.

I like the best round number '0' ;-)

Yes, I know Jonathan, you have an extreme emotional attitude towards
them. The use of both zero and infinity are a sign of deep seated
fundamentalist tendencies. Please consider purchasing (a steal at
$US12.50), my "How to stop getting sucked in by Zero - how to start
enjoying both positive and negative integers")


Have you sold many copies?

You are one of the sickest things, dorayme!

I take that as an extreme compliment.

Nah, I have not sold a single copy. I am beginning to think I may be
pushing a lost cause.

--
dorayme

On Apr 29, 11:11 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote:

The trouble with that idea is that you are adding more than is needed to
do a job. In the Framepeace literature we have an article - you can buy
it* without joining. We recommend not to multiply frames beyond
necessity.

I knew that already without having to pay you fifteen bucks.

--
Dan

On Apr 29, 11:17 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote:

In article <67omlrF2osnf... (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>,
If there were 2 Hitler's in control of Nazi Germany, the end result
might have been better, not worse, each might have modified the other or
countered the other.

I'll need a ruling on how, or if, Godwin's Law applies to the novel
situation of creating an analogy to not one but *two* Hitlers.

--
Dan

Dan wrote:

On Apr 29, 11:17 pm, dorayme wrote:
In article <GG-mangled>,
If there were 2 Hitler's in control of Nazi Germany, the end result
might have been better, not worse, each might have modified the other or
countered the other.

I'll need a ruling on how, or if, Godwin's Law applies to the novel
situation of creating an analogy to not one but *two* Hitlers.

Depends on whether you're interpreting Godwin's Law under Earth rules or
Martian rules.

--
John
Is it "Martian of Queensberry rules?"

In article
<9e551ca8-7fbc-4507-be16-858a05bf97de (AT) f63g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
Dan <dan (AT) tobias (DOT) name> wrote:

On Apr 29, 11:11 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote:
The trouble with that idea is that you are adding more than is needed to
do a job. In the Framepeace literature we have an article - you can buy
it* without joining. We recommend not to multiply frames beyond
necessity.

I knew that already without having to pay you fifteen bucks.

But there are Irish jokes and other amusements embedded in the
literature. You get excellent value for money. Honest! You do! Hey,
Dan... come back... honest... hey!...

Damn, he got away!

--
dorayme

In article <4819f6db$1_4 (AT) news (DOT) bluewin.ch>,
John Hosking <John (AT) DELETE (DOT) Hosking.name.INVALID> wrote:

Dan wrote:
On Apr 29, 11:17 pm, dorayme wrote:
In article <GG-mangled>,
If there were 2 Hitler's in control of Nazi Germany, the end result
might have been better, not worse, each might have modified the other or
countered the other.

I'll need a ruling on how, or if, Godwin's Law applies to the novel
situation of creating an analogy to not one but *two* Hitlers.

Depends on whether you're interpreting Godwin's Law under Earth rules or
Martian rules.

No need for such complications here, let me pay due respect to Earth
rules.

For Godwin's law to apply, there needs to be a personally cutting and
vindictive motive to the mention of Hitler. But, as everyone knows, I
*love* Bergamot and any reference therefore could not possibly have the
right intent to make it a Godwin's Law Formatting Context.

--
dorayme