HighDots Forums  

Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide?

HTML Writing HTML for the Web (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)


Discuss Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? in the HTML forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
john_williams_800@hotmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? - 07-11-2005 , 09:19 AM






Hi;

I am thinking of working on a site for a local nonprofit group.

Since I will have the option of starting from the beginning I thought I
would look into making the site Bobby compliant.

I looked at some sites on the web and I got the impression that I would
have to do a huge amount of reading to even learn what Bobby compliance
entails.

Does anyone know of a short and/or cryptic list of "do this" & "don't
do that"s that would get a site to ( or reasonably close ) to Bobby
compliance?


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Harlan Messinger
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? - 07-11-2005 , 10:30 AM






john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
Hi;

I am thinking of working on a site for a local nonprofit group.

Since I will have the option of starting from the beginning I thought I
would look into making the site Bobby compliant.

I looked at some sites on the web and I got the impression that I would
have to do a huge amount of reading to even learn what Bobby compliance
entails.
There's no such thing as "Bobby compliance". Bobby is a tool that
assists in determining compliance with the Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines of the World Wide Web Consortium,

http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/

or alternatively, the Section 508 regulations applicable to government
systems in the US,

http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?...=Content&ID=12



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Jukka K. Korpela
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? - 07-11-2005 , 01:38 PM



"john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com" <john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:
Since I will have the option of starting from the beginning I
thought I would look into making the site Bobby compliant.
Why?

Quote:
Does anyone know of a short and/or cryptic list of "do this" &
"don't do that"s that would get a site to ( or reasonably close )
to Bobby compliance?
There isn't.

But the brief guide to Bobby is: ignore it.

Bobby is overrated, confusing, and misleading. Accessibility isn't
about satisfying this or that set of tests.

It's much better to start from e.g. the http://www.webaim.org/ site,
which is practically oriented and serious about the needs of _people_,
not that much about artificial "compliance tests".

P.S. This isn't really about HTML, since accessibility is about Web
pages in general, not just the HTML side. I'd suggest posting further
questions on accessibility to c.i.w.a.misc.

--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Pages about Web authoring: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www.html



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
David Ross
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? - 07-11-2005 , 02:15 PM



"john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com" wrote:
Quote:
Hi;

I am thinking of working on a site for a local nonprofit group.

Since I will have the option of starting from the beginning I thought I
would look into making the site Bobby compliant.

I looked at some sites on the web and I got the impression that I would
have to do a huge amount of reading to even learn what Bobby compliance
entails.

Does anyone know of a short and/or cryptic list of "do this" & "don't
do that"s that would get a site to ( or reasonably close ) to Bobby
compliance?
Start by making your pages compliant with the W3C specifications
for HTML and CSS. Accessibility for the handicapped largely
assumes such compliance but then goes further by providing content
and style guidelines.

Go to <URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/> for the WAI guidelines.
Scroll down to section 6 and read the guidelines in the boxes.
There are only 14 succint statements. The rest is explanatory
commentary in case you don't understand the boxes.

Bobby itself is obsolete. Test your pages with Watchfire's WebXACT
at <URL:http://webxact.watchfire.com/ScanForm.aspx>. Bobby was a
Watchfire capability that is no longer maintained even if the Bobby
logo is still used.

--

David E. Ross
<URL:http://www.rossde.com/>

I use Mozilla as my Web browser because I want a browser that
complies with Web standards. See <URL:http://www.mozilla.org/>.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Adrienne
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? - 07-11-2005 , 07:06 PM



Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com"
<john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> writing in news:1121087942.686329.246900
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:

Quote:
Hi;

I am thinking of working on a site for a local nonprofit group.

Since I will have the option of starting from the beginning I thought I
would look into making the site Bobby compliant.

I looked at some sites on the web and I got the impression that I would
have to do a huge amount of reading to even learn what Bobby compliance
entails.

Does anyone know of a short and/or cryptic list of "do this" & "don't
do that"s that would get a site to ( or reasonably close ) to Bobby
compliance?

As others have said, Bobby doesn't exist anymore, and automated
accessibility testing is not the beat all to end all. With that said, I
prefer Cynthia Says <http://www.contentquality.com/Default.asp> and
aDesigner available from <http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/adesigner>,
which will also test for low vision and different types of color blindness.

--
Adrienne Boswell
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Stan McCann
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? - 07-11-2005 , 07:56 PM



kchayka <usenet (AT) c-net (DOT) us> wrote in news:3jg7o8Fpq305U1 (AT) individual (DOT) net:

Quote:
David Ross wrote:

Bobby itself is obsolete. Test your pages with Watchfire's WebXACT

I doubt WebXACT is really any better than Bobby was. The only thing
automatic tools might be good for is pointing out glaring potential
accessiblity issues. I would never trust them to tell me that a page
was actually accessible. Those tools are not capable of making that
kind of judgement call.
I couldn't test any pages there. What's it want, cookies? All I got
was session expired notices. You're probably right about its
usefulness too. I was never happy with the advice from any testing
that I've tried to do on accessibility. "Thank you very much, I
already know that I should use alt attributes." My pet peeve.

Quote:
A better idea is to take Jukka's advice, visit webaim.org, and do
some reading.

Nice. I've already done a bit of reading there. I plan to do much
more, especially while we are considering a total revamping of our
website. I'll be taking some of that info into the meeting Wednesday
that will kick off ideas for a new site design.

--
Stan McCann "Uncle Pirate" http://stanmccann.us/pirate.html
Webmaster/Computer Center Manager, NMSU at Alamogordo
http://alamo.nmsu.edu/ There are 10 kinds of people.
Those that understand binary and those that don't.


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Andy Dingley
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Bobby Compliance - is there a brief guide? - 07-11-2005 , 08:53 PM



On 11 Jul 2005 06:19:02 -0700, "john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com"
<john_williams_800 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Does anyone know of a short and/or cryptic list of "do this" & "don't
do that"s
http://joeclark.org/book/sashay/serialization/



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.