aww, ciwah Regs only: overflow work

I may be getting a substantial amount of overflow work doing
remediation of web documents. If interested, shoot me an e-mail at
kgroves (AT) webaccessstrategies (DOT) com

You'll be required to produce valid, accessible markup in a timely
manner. Respond with references and rates in USD.

TIA

In article
<877e1c28-1320-4e5e-9973-8bba209e8baa (AT) 59g2000hsb (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
KarlCore <karl (AT) karlcore (DOT) com> wrote:

I may be getting a substantial amount of overflow work doing
remediation of web documents.

What does remediation mean in the context of web documents? In fact,
what is a web document?

--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:

In article
877e1c28-1320-4e5e-9973-8bba209e8baa...oglegroups.com>,
KarlCore <karl (AT) karlcore (DOT) com> wrote:

I may be getting a substantial amount of overflow work doing
remediation of web documents.

What does remediation mean in the context of web documents?

Why would the "context of web documents" matter?
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=remediation

--
Berg

In article <65vbvaF2idcs0U1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>,
Bergamot <bergamot (AT) visi (DOT) com> wrote:

dorayme wrote:
In article
877e1c28-1320-4e5e-9973-8bba209e8baa...oglegroups.com>,
KarlCore <karl (AT) karlcore (DOT) com> wrote:

I may be getting a substantial amount of overflow work doing
remediation of web documents.

What does remediation mean in the context of web documents?

Why would the "context of web documents" matter?
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=remediation

I was more wondering about questions of scope. I suppose html docs were
meant and that the mistakes were all kinds of faults. What is the scope
of faults. Technical or more aesthetic or more usability... Or vaguely
all?

--
dorayme