![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
seems to be only one thing to do: issue a challenge to all of the CSS gurus of the world to prove that CSS really can do what it claims to do. The challenge seems simple as first blush. |
|
So, are you up to the challenge? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
OK, so I know that there has been a lot of discussion on this topic, but none of the answers have been satisfactory. Therefore there seems to be only one thing to do: issue a challenge to all of the CSS gurus of the world to prove that CSS really can do what it claims to do. The challenge seems simple as first blush. We take a simple case of table-based layout: table align="center" cellpadding="4" td bgcolor="yellow" Some stuff /td /table This simply prints "Some stuff" centered, with a yellow background. All we want to do is recreate this example using CSS. No problem, right? Just to be clear, there are a few requirements: * The text area (and its background) must automatically resize to fit the size of the text. In other words, no div's of predefined width. * It must be possible to put this inside another div and have the text centered within the space of the parent div. Any surrounding content should flow in a normal and predictable fashion, just like the original table-based layout. In other words, no floating divs. * The background must extend a few pixels beyond the text. In other words no embedding a span inside a div. * The contained text ("Some stuff") might be multiple lines or contain additional markup. The solution must be able to accommodate this. Like I said, a span inside a div ain't gonna cut it. * The solution must work on all mainstream modern browsers. At a minimum this means FireFox 1.0+, Opera 8+ and Safari. Oh and that other one... what was it... oh yeah, IE 6.0+ (5.0+ would be nice, I'd live with 6.0). There go some more possible solutions, like display: table-cell. * The solution should validate to W3C standard xhtml and CSS. Note that I said "should" and not "must." I'm purist until purity fails to get the job done. So, are you up to the challenge? I'm pretty close to convinced that it can't be done. Someone please prove me wrong. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |