Re: how many px equal to 100% width?

"mao" <kc.at.sinzon (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

Hi,

if I set my body element width to be 100%, how many px value equal to
this 100% width?

Fourty two.

--
Richard.

In article <XBK8j.23972$CN4.16389 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
"rf" <rf (AT) invalid (DOT) com> wrote:

"mao" <kc.at.sinzon (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:a4551f4c-c451-4095-9a3e-2a1c645e95fd (AT) i29g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Hi,

if I set my body element width to be 100%, how many px value equal to
this 100% width?

Fourty two.

That is brief prattle. I thought this was not allowed?

--
dorayme

rf wrote:

Fourty two.

Not everyone's cellphone is as tiny as mine.

--
Steve Swift
http://www.swiftys.org.uk/swifty.html
http://www.ringers.org.uk

dorayme wrote:

In article <XBK8j.23972$CN4.16389 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
"rf" <rf (AT) invalid (DOT) com> wrote:

"mao" <kc.at.sinzon (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:a4551f4c-c451-4095-9a3e-2a1c645e95fd (AT) i29g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Hi,

if I set my body element width to be 100%, how many px value equal to
this 100% width?
Fourty two.

That is brief prattle. I thought this was not allowed?

I've heard of briefs by Pierre Cardin and Fruit of the Loom, but never
of brief Prattle. In any case, I'm sure that they are all allowed.

In article <Ra2dnf6V4oWjBf7anZ2dnUVZ_qelnZ2d (AT) golden (DOT) net>,
Gus Richter <gusrichter (AT) netscape (DOT) net> wrote:

dorayme wrote:
In article <XBK8j.23972$CN4.16389 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
"rf" <rf (AT) invalid (DOT) com> wrote:

"mao" <kc.at.sinzon (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:a4551f4c-c451-4095-9a3e-2a1c645e95fd (AT) i29g2000prf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Hi,

if I set my body element width to be 100%, how many px value equal to
this 100% width?
Fourty two.

That is brief prattle. I thought this was not allowed?

I've heard of briefs by Pierre Cardin and Fruit of the Loom, but never
of brief Prattle. In any case, I'm sure that they are all allowed.

I am sure they are. I momentarily forgot not to pull rf's chain,
there is something about an Australian that makes it hard to
resist. I do hope he does not take it the wrong way. He is VERY
sensitive where I am concerned. Actually his remark was quite
good and it has a particular pedigree:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Answer_...verse,_and_Eve
rything

<g>

--
dorayme