Re: Help -- getting 100% height on borders

In article
<1193523037.544979.237140 (AT) 22g2000hsm (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
crazyhorse <mjbaldwin (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

/body
/html

(Trying my plea again...)

Nobody? No advice at all?

You might have more luck supplying a url rather than such a lot
of code. It pisses off people to be told to load up so much. It
is generally acceptable (imo) to give a small amount if there is
any liklihood that it can be understood there and then as markup
without browser loading...

If I was feeling generous, I would have to do this:

copy and paste all the code into my editor

use a GREP pattern to remove all the quotation characters that my
newsreader has added at this stage

If I was feeling very generous I would load it up to a server for
you right now. Like this:

http://netweaver.com.au/test/crazyhorse.html

and take a peek at:

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...2F%2Fnetweaver
..com.au%2Ftest%2Fcrazyhorse.html

but surely you can reduce this number?

--
dorayme

On Oct 27, 8:58 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote:

In article
1193523037.544979.237... (AT) 22g2000hsm (DOT) googlegroups.com>,

crazyhorse <mjbald... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
/body
/html

(Trying my plea again...)

Nobody? No advice at all?

You might have more luck supplying a url rather than such a lot
of code. It pisses off people to be told to load up so much. It
is generally acceptable (imo) to give a small amount if there is
any liklihood that it can be understood there and then as markup
without browser loading...

If I was feeling generous, I would have to do this:

copy and paste all the code into my editor

use a GREP pattern to remove all the quotation characters that my
newsreader has added at this stage

If I was feeling very generous I would load it up to a server for
you right now. Like this:

http://netweaver.com.au/test/crazyhorse.html

and take a peek at:

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...2F%2Fnetweaver
.com.au%2Ftest%2Fcrazyhorse.html

but surely you can reduce this number?

--
dorayme

Thanks for trying to post it, sorry I'm new to this group and didn't
realize URLs were recommended.

Here's a link to it in its validated glory:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/mjbaldwinjr/test.html

So, any ideas on fixing the problem?

I am using XHTML strict just on the advice of fellow coders that it's
best to use if possible... but if using Transitional or something
would help, I could switch...

Thanks again
Michael

In article
<1193530978.561126.31790 (AT) d55g2000hsg (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
crazyhorse <mjbaldwin (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

http://netweaver.com.au/test/crazyhorse.html

and take a peek at:

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...2F%2Fnetweaver
.com.au%2Ftest%2Fcrazyhorse.html

but surely you can reduce this number?

--
dorayme


Thanks for trying to post it, sorry I'm new to this group and didn't
realize URLs were recommended.

"Trying" suggests it does not show. I don't know why? Anyway, it
incorporates the doctype that JL recommends... and shows up in
all my browsers. Sure fixes many of the errors so JL advice is
certainly first thing you should do.

Here's a link to it in its validated glory:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/mjbaldwinjr/test.html

--
dorayme