Re: Differences..

In article <rD41m.3965$k_6.842 (AT) newsfe01 (DOT) iad>,
William Gill <nospam (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

dorayme wrote:
But is it true? It sounds as if it is no ordinary paragraph. <g


And to think, you once championed elimination of the paragraph (or
something to that effect). <g

No, quite the opposite, William! I am a big fan of the paragraph. I once
gave *a defence* of it that went beyond the really rather pathetic
explanation that you should use a paragraph element for paragraphs
because that is what they are for. That is like arguing that if you want
a baby you should have sex because that is what sex is for. It is more
complicated than that! Better get outa here I can hear my son coming to
chastise me horribly... <g>

--
dorayme

On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:27:48 +1000, dorayme wrote:

That is like arguing that if you want
a baby you should have sex because that is what sex is for. It is more
complicated than that! Better get outa here I can hear my son coming to
chastise me horribly... <g

No, sit where you are. Remember: If you don't run, you can't be chaste.

--
John
Wait, what's the past participle of chastise?