Re: CSS Width Problem

André Rodrigues wrote:

http://www.inforquali.pt/inforquali_novo/index4.html

Do you see that network cable? It is supposed to grow in function of
the size of the window.

As Mark pointed out it is doing what you told it to do. You defined the

position as absolute so the image is not going anywhere regardless of what
happens around it.
BTW: underscores are illegal in CSS identifiers. Some browsers ignore such.

--
jmm dash list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

jmm-list-gn <jmm-list.AXSPAMGN (AT) sohnen-moe (DOT) com> wrote:

BTW: underscores are illegal in CSS identifiers.

Nope: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates...12-errata.html

Some browsers ignore such.

Nothing relevant.

--
Spartanicus

Spartanicus wrote:

BTW: underscores are illegal in CSS identifiers.

Nope: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates...12-errata.html

Argh.

--
jmm dash list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, jmm-list-gn wrote:

Spartanicus wrote:

BTW: underscores are illegal in CSS identifiers.

technically correct for CSS2.0 as published.

Nope: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates...12-errata.html

Not yet ratified as a W3C TR, unless you know better.
This will be in CSS2.1

Argh.

Gesundheit.

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:54:02 +0100, "Alan J. Flavell"
<flavell (AT) ph (DOT) gla.ac.uk> wrote:

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, jmm-list-gn wrote:

Spartanicus wrote:

BTW: underscores are illegal in CSS identifiers.

technically correct for CSS2.0 as published.

Nope: http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates...12-errata.html

Not yet ratified as a W3C TR, unless you know better.

but it's an Errata, that's just part of what the WG have to do, they
don't get ratified, they just get published don't they? There's no
process requirement around them.

Jim.
--
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/

Alan J. Flavell wrote:

Argh.

Gesundheit.
Danke.

--
jmm dash list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)