Re: absolutely no gap between table rows?

Petr Vileta wrote:

Yes, but I don't know if author use css2.1 or css2.0

It matters not what the author intended, since browsers don't make any
distinction. In reality, CSS 2.1 is the only one supported these days,
with a few 3.0 things thrown in here and there.

Mac IE5 is the only browser I know of that supports 2.0 instead of 2.1,
and it's a dead browser. Anything older than MacIE isn't worth sweating
over, either.

and don't know too if all
browser really know about w3c reccomendation

No browser has 100% support but all the major browsers have at least
pretty good support. If a browser doesn't grok the 2.1 specs, unless
it's something obscure you can bet money the user already knows they
have a deficient browser and has learned to suffer with it, or work
around it.

--
Berg

Bergamot wrote:

Petr Vileta wrote:
and don't know too if all
browser really know about w3c reccomendation

No browser has 100% support but all the major browsers have at least
pretty good support. If a browser doesn't grok the 2.1 specs, unless
it's something obscure you can bet money the user already knows they
have a deficient browser and has learned to suffer with it, or work
around it.
I'm using IE6. I patched it by all updates provided by MS but I'm not sure if

this browser really apply all css rules right. I not need to upgrade to IE7
because this browser is user unfriendly and I'm not the only who have the same
opinoin of IE7 ;-)
--
Petr Vileta, Czech republic
(My server rejects all messages from Yahoo and Hotmail. Send me your
mail from another non-spammer site please.)

Please reply to <petr AT practisoft DOT cz>

In article <fq2cdm$1pgp$1 (AT) ns (DOT) felk.cvut.cz>,
"Petr Vileta" <stoupa (AT) practisoft (DOT) cz> wrote:

Bergamot wrote:
Petr Vileta wrote:
and don't know too if all
browser really know about w3c reccomendation

No browser has 100% support but all the major browsers have at least
pretty good support. If a browser doesn't grok the 2.1 specs, unless
it's something obscure you can bet money the user already knows they
have a deficient browser and has learned to suffer with it, or work
around it.
I'm using IE6. I patched it by all updates provided by MS but I'm not sure if
this browser really apply all css rules right. I not need to upgrade to IE7
because this browser is user unfriendly and I'm not the only who have the
same
opinoin of IE7 ;-)

If you are wondering about issues to do with making website
pages, it is not relevant what any particular one of us uses or
what we think of what we use or what we might have done to the
browser personally. I use IE very rarely. And when I do, I eat a
little corner of it if I am hungry. But this still does not
influence how I make a web page. The only thing that I worry
about in general is have I made any silly mistake that Bergamot
would see instantly. It is a galvanizing idea.

--
dorayme

Petr Vileta wrote:

Bergamot wrote:
Petr Vileta wrote:
and don't know too if all
browser really know about w3c reccomendation

No browser has 100% support but all the major browsers have at least
pretty good support. If a browser doesn't grok the 2.1 specs, unless
it's something obscure you can bet money the user already knows they
have a deficient browser and has learned to suffer with it, or work
around it.
I'm using IE6. I patched it by all updates provided by MS but I'm not
sure if this browser really apply all css rules right.

Not hardly. IE7 better, but far from perfect and compared to other
browsers quite inferior.

I not need to
upgrade to IE7 because this browser is user unfriendly and I'm not the
only who have the same opinoin of IE7 ;-)

Neither should be your design tool.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

dorayme wrote:

If you are wondering about issues to do with making website
pages, it is not relevant what any particular one of us uses or
what we think of what we use or what we might have done to the
browser personally. I use IE very rarely. And when I do, I eat a
little corner of it if I am hungry. But this still does not
influence how I make a web page. The only thing that I worry
about in general is have I made any silly mistake that Bergamot
would see instantly. It is a galvanizing idea.
Maybe you will agree with me that is important for who is pages designed for.

When 90% of supposed visitors will be Windows users (say pages about Windows
tricks) then is not important "damaged look" in Opera, Firefox etc., but look
in IE6/7 could be doing in "pixel resolution".

When pages is designed for general public (say bank application, blog,
internet portal etc.) then graphic look must compromise with page content and
relativelly the same look in all browsers.

When pages are designed for Linux users only then look is very unimportant
/linux users haven't aestetic taste ;-)/ and you can ignore IE browsers
existence too.
--
Petr Vileta, Czech republic
(My server rejects all messages from Yahoo and Hotmail. Send me your
mail from another non-spammer site please.)

Please reply to <petr AT practisoft DOT cz>

On 28 Feb, 01:06, "Petr Vileta" <sto... (AT) practisoft (DOT) cz> wrote:

Maybe you will agree with me that is important for who is pages designed for.

It isn't, because we don't get to choose who views them, or how they
choose to do it. We must serve everyone.

Assuming the "www" in this newsgroup name, and that we don't choose to
start browser-sniffing.

In article <fq52sk$3gq$1 (AT) ns (DOT) felk.cvut.cz>,
"Petr Vileta" <stoupa (AT) practisoft (DOT) cz> wrote:

dorayme wrote:
If you are wondering about issues to do with making website
pages, it is not relevant what any particular one of us uses or
what we think of what we use or what we might have done to the
browser personally. I use IE very rarely.


Maybe you will agree with me that is important for who is pages designed for.

I agree that if you know who your visitors will be, and if you
want them to be well served, you will design for them.

When 90% of supposed visitors will be Windows users (say pages about Windows
tricks) then is not important "damaged look" in Opera, Firefox etc., but look
in IE6/7 could be doing in "pixel resolution".

When I am away from my office, unsurprisingly, I cannot always
use a Mac. I have to suffer on Winboxes elsewhere. I often find I
am looking things up to do with Macs. I would be displeased to
see a webpage horribly broken on the machine I happened to be on
at the time just because it was about Macs and I was on Windows.

Just btw or not, 10% can be an awful lot of people. You would
know it if they tried to hunt you down and kill you. I know I
hate being chased by bloodthirsty mobs for doing very little to
provoke them.

When pages is designed for general public (say bank application, blog,
internet portal etc.) then graphic look must compromise with page content and
relativelly the same look in all browsers.

When pages are designed for Linux users only then look is very unimportant
/linux users haven't aestetic taste ;-)/ and you can ignore IE browsers
existence too.

I know what you mean, but I wonder if a field study would back
you up. I now and then come across Linux and Windows users with
some sense of taste. But that is just one lone visitor to the
planet, not much to go on statistically. <g>

--
dorayme