Probllem with repeat-x

Rhino pisze:

#fixed-footer {
background-image: url("/~cat/images/footer_reflection_266x200.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: center;
height: 200px;
width: 100%;
position: fixed;
bottom: 0px;
z-index: 5;
}

Is there any way to have the image repeat without any border being generated
around it?

Without insight into the original source code will be something hard to
help. Try to shoot something.

#fixed-footer {
background:url("/~cat/images/footer_reflection_266x200.jpg") repeat-x
50% 50%;
height:200px;
width:100%;
position:fixed;
bottom:0;
z-index:5;
padding:0;
margin:0;
border:0;
}

img{
border:0;
}

Are You sure to use width:100%?

--
Peter

C A Upsdell wrote:

Rhino wrote:
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela (AT) cs (DOT) tut.fi> wrote in message
news:vU76l.110942$_03.102931 (AT) reader1 (DOT) news.saunalahti.fi...
Rhino wrote:

Here is the relevant CSS:
Give us the URL or stop bothering us.

I'm trying to respect my client's confidentiality by not showing her
site to anyone until it is done. I had hoped the solution would be
obvious from the CSS. If it's not, please feel free to disregard my
post. There's no need to be snippy.

(Jukka has every right to be snippy. Too many people come here looking
for help, supplying code instead on a URL.)

This is house rules, so to speak. But where are the rules posted?
There's no regularly posted FAQ, or a link to it.

And the rules for posting vary from group to group. You wouldn't be
posting a url in a php group, but the code. Same with javascript.

Now, in this case, there certainly is no way to have found the
problem without a url, but that is not always the case. Many questions
can benefit by a snip of code.

Now, I don't see a problem with enforcing "house rules", but we can't
expect every new poster to be aware of them.

And on another note, many people don't want to become embroiled in a
code critique. Ugly html is one thing but people get trashed for fixed
width designs, choice of fonts,... There's a running battle between the
pragmatists and the pedantics. I'm resistant to posting urls for those
very reasons.

Ultimately the only practical lasting advise I can give is that you
will get your feelings hurt in this group, and you'll just have to get
over it. If you really want to know CSS, and it is very important in web
design, than this *is* the place.

Any, what you should do to get help here, while preserving your client's
confidentiality, is to make a simple test page in which anything
extraneous and identifying has been stripped away.

Good advice.

Jeff


Then send the URL to

that page ... although you may be able to find the problem yourself if
you create a simple test page which demonstrates your problem, since it
reduces the mass of code that you have to focus on.

Rhino wrote:

I'm trying to respect my client's confidentiality by not showing her
site to anyone until it is done.

Why don't you then tell your client to hire a more competent designer?

Please keep using the same forged "From" information as long as you remain
clueless. Thank you in advance.

--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/