![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have two img elements in a div tag, the first set up w/ float:left and the second set up w/ float:right. When the browser's window width is less than the total width of the two images second img wrapps below the first. I can prevent this through the use of overflow: hidden on the containing div tag, but this a css2 style not implemented in mozilla until 6.0. Is there another was to prevent this? TIA~ PJ |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I can prevent this through the use of overflow: hidden on the containing div tag, but this a css2 style not implemented in mozilla until 6.0. Is there another was to prevent this? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Try using something like: div { min-width : 400px; } |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
According to the CSS Reference in Danny Goodman's DHTML definitive guide IE does not support the min-width attribute at all and only NN6+ supports it. However, I tested in IE6 and it does seem to work. Does anyone know the browser support for the min-width attribute? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
PJ wrote: Does anyone know the browser support for the min-width attribute? KHTML family (Konqueror, Safari): Yes |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
KHTML family (Konqueror, Safari): Yes I don't think KHTML browsers support min-height or min-width, at least Safari v85 doesn't. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <3f8be9a2$1 (AT) news (DOT) sihope.com>, kchayka <kcha-un-yka (AT) sihope (DOT) com> wrote: KHTML family (Konqueror, Safari): Yes I don't think KHTML browsers support min-height or min-width, at least Safari v85 doesn't. Oh, I thought I had it working (min-width, that is). However, it will not work on absolute positioned elements, which is a bug and is known at Apple. 24 october will be a good day. -- Kris kristiaan (AT) xs4all (DOT) netherlands (nl) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |