![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:21:44 +0100, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah ng4rrjanb... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA I just call it 'important', because that what it is. The ! is just a delimiter.http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#important-rules |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 20, 3:41 pm, "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoe... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:21:44 +0100, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah ng4rrjanb... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA I just call it 'important', because that what it is. The ! is just a delimiter.http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#important-rules "important" is the meaning and I understand it. But, think about the situation of teacher who has to refer the notation when he write it on board; how should he refer? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 20, 3:41 pm, "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoe... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:21:44 +0100, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah ng4rrjanb... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA I just call it 'important', because that what it is. The ! is just a delimiter.http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#important-rules "important" is the meaning and I understand it. But, think about the situation of teacher who has to refer the notation when he write it on board; how should he refer? OT Here in South India, people refer a*b as "a into b". But, lately I have seen that Dijkstra refers it as "a times b" (in a google video). /OT |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
OT Here in South India, people refer a*b as "a into b". But, lately I have seen that Dijkstra refers it as "a times b" (in a google video). /OT |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article 9231b3ea-e956-40c1-9a01-4a81a0dda... (AT) s8g2000prg (DOT) googlegroups.com>, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" <ng4rrjanb... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: snip I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA snip By analogy with shell scripts "bang important" Seems to work... |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 20, 4:32 pm, David Stone wrote: In article <blahblah.googlegroups.com>, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" wrote: snip I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA snip By analogy with shell scripts "bang important" Seems to work... In C, we refer "!" as "not". So, I refer "!important" as "not important". But, I'm still interested in official way of referring. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
In C, we refer "!" as "not". So, I refer "!important" as "not important". But, I'm still interested in official way of referring. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 20, 4:32 pm, David Stone <no.em... (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote: In article 9231b3ea-e956-40c1-9a01-4a81a0dda... (AT) s8g2000prg (DOT) googlegroups.com>, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" <ng4rrjanb... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: snip I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA snip By analogy with shell scripts "bang important" Seems to work... In C, we refer "!" as "not". So, I refer "!important" as "not important". But, I'm still interested in official way of referring. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |