HighDots Forums  

Image liquidity: permissible?

Cascading Style Sheets Layout/presentation on the WWW (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets)


Discuss Image liquidity: permissible? in the Cascading Style Sheets forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Chris F.A. Johnson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Image liquidity: permissible? - 01-30-2010 , 01:07 AM






On 2010-01-30, rf wrote:
Quote:
"Mason C" <masoncXXX (AT) XXXfrontal-lobe (DOT) info> wrote in message
news:6ug7m59bv67lvafm9lsdvkbenlms7tco93 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On 30 Jan 2010 04:06:11 GMT, "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson (AT) gmail (DOT) com
wrote:

On 2010-01-27, Mason C wrote:
The new page proposed is: http://frontal-lobe.info/new/index.html

http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/frontal-lobe2.jpg

OK, Chris, how did you achieve that? I cannot on numerous browsers.

I can.

Text zoom.
No, I did not use text zoom. I used my default font size.

Quote:
And don't tell us that text zoom is bad. It's available and so people *will*
use it. Some browsers *only* have text zoom.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfajohnson.com>
================================================== =================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Shell (2009, Apress)

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
dorayme
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Image liquidity: permissible? - 01-30-2010 , 02:30 AM






In article <2eQ8n.4388$pv.4047 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
"rf" <rf@z.invalid> wrote:

Quote:
"Mason C" <masoncXXX (AT) XXXfrontal-lobe (DOT) info> wrote in message
news:6ug7m59bv67lvafm9lsdvkbenlms7tco93 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On 30 Jan 2010 04:06:11 GMT, "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson (AT) gmail (DOT) com
wrote:

On 2010-01-27, Mason C wrote:
The new page proposed is: http://frontal-lobe.info/new/index.html

http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/frontal-lobe2.jpg

OK, Chris, how did you achieve that? I cannot on numerous browsers.

I can.

Text zoom.

And don't tell us that text zoom is bad. It's available and so people *will*
use it.

The zoomers will happily let their images deteriorate in quality!
Please God, let browsers keep text enlargement till I leave this
earth, I will be nice to JK for ever no matter what he says or
how he says it.

--
dorayme

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
rf
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Image liquidity: permissible? - 01-30-2010 , 02:40 AM



"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:
In article <2eQ8n.4388$pv.4047 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
"rf" <rf@z.invalid> wrote:

"Mason C" <masoncXXX (AT) XXXfrontal-lobe (DOT) info> wrote in message
news:6ug7m59bv67lvafm9lsdvkbenlms7tco93 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On 30 Jan 2010 04:06:11 GMT, "Chris F.A. Johnson"
cfajohnson (AT) gmail (DOT) com
wrote:

On 2010-01-27, Mason C wrote:
The new page proposed is:
http://frontal-lobe.info/new/index.html

http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/frontal-lobe2.jpg

OK, Chris, how did you achieve that? I cannot on numerous browsers.

I can.

Text zoom.

And don't tell us that text zoom is bad. It's available and so people
*will*
use it.


The zoomers will happily let their images deteriorate in quality!
Please God, let browsers keep text enlargement till I leave this
earth, I will be nice to JK for ever no matter what he says or
how he says it.
Indeed. But look at the offending image? It's bloody stuffed anyway.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
dorayme
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Image liquidity: permissible? - 01-30-2010 , 04:30 AM



In article <9gS8n.4429$pv.3074 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
"rf" <rf@z.invalid> wrote:

Quote:
"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
....
The zoomers will happily let their images deteriorate in quality!
Please God, let browsers keep text enlargement till I leave this
earth, I will be nice to JK for ever no matter what he says or
how he says it.

Indeed. But look at the offending image? It's bloody stuffed anyway.
You're not wrong. At the very least, if it was the very last
picture on earth of Mason C, better without the colours:

<http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/justPics/masonC.jpg>

--
dorayme

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
rf
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Image liquidity: permissible? - 01-30-2010 , 04:58 AM



"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:
In article <9gS8n.4429$pv.3074 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
"rf" <rf@z.invalid> wrote:

"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
...
The zoomers will happily let their images deteriorate in quality!
Please God, let browsers keep text enlargement till I leave this
earth, I will be nice to JK for ever no matter what he says or
how he says it.

Indeed. But look at the offending image? It's bloody stuffed anyway.

You're not wrong. At the very least, if it was the very last
picture on earth of Mason C, better without the colours:

http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/justPics/masonC.jpg
I was thinking about this thing:

http://frontal-lobe.info/new/bookillus5.gif

It's the one he has made "liquid".

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.