![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
Answering to me... And here's the documentation. Once you know what to google for... http://www.456bereastreet.com/archiv...e_gap_between_... Alas, I can now add another workaround: assign a border or padding to the li elements... Gregor |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
GTalbot wrote: On 8 déc, 19:11, Gregor Kofler <use... (AT) gregorkofler (DOT) at> wrote: Answering to me... And here's the documentation. Once you know what to google for... http://www.456bereastreet.com/archiv...e_gap_between_.... Alas, I can now add another workaround: assign a border or padding to the li elements... Gregor Gregor, I still can not reproduce your problem, at least in IE7. And I tried the provided code at http://www.456bereastreet.com/archiv...e_gap_between_... while Roger Johansson claims "The result will be a vertical list of links with large gaps between them in Internet Explorer up to and including IE 7 beta 3, and smaller gaps in the release version of IE 7. There should not be any gaps." but there is no gap in the final release of IE7 (build 5730.11). Maybe if you could create a reduced testcase and upload it then we could all follow you on a defined, determined testcase. Just a suggestion, of course. What the hell - nothing better to do on a wet Sunday ![]() http://www.lester1.eclipse.co.uk/listbug.html This is how things look in IE6: http://www.lester1.eclipse.co.uk/listbug.gif HTH |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |