HTML for Ebooks - TOC

In article <Tx%4m.3495$ze1.352 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
Alex Bell <afjbell (AT) bigpond (DOT) net.au> wrote:

I have been using Liam Quinn's off line validator 'A Real Validator' for
years, but it seems that it is not enough. It did validate the file, but
I'll check into your comments.

If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs. And the probably
the best validators too!

--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:

In article <Tx%4m.3495$ze1.352 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>,
Alex Bell <afjbell (AT) bigpond (DOT) net.au> wrote:

I have been using Liam Quinn's off line validator 'A Real Validator' for
years, but it seems that it is not enough. It did validate the file, but
I'll check into your comments.

If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs. And the probably
the best validators too!

Thanks again. I use FF routinely, and I'll follow up on your suggestion.

--
Regards, Alex

In article <doraymeRidThis-136FBC.10080409072009 (AT) news (DOT) albasani.net>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> writes:

In article <Tx%4m.3495$ze1.352 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>, Alex Bell <afjbell (AT) bigpond (DOT) net.au> wrote:

I have been using Liam Quinn's off line validator 'A Real Validator' for
years, but it seems that it is not enough. It did validate the file, but
I'll check into your comments.

If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs.

I'd like those -- do you have any idea what they're called?

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
Life's too important to take seriously.

Michael Stemper wrote:

In article <doraymeRidThis-136FBC.10080409072009 (AT) news (DOT) albasani.net>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> writes:
In article <Tx%4m.3495$ze1.352 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>, Alex Bell <afjbell (AT) bigpond (DOT) net.au> wrote:

I have been using Liam Quinn's off line validator 'A Real Validator' for
years, but it seems that it is not enough. It did validate the file, but
I'll check into your comments.
If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs.

I'd like those -- do you have any idea what they're called?

Web Developer Bar extension

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Michael Stemper wrote:
In article <doraymeRidThis-136FBC.10080409072009 (AT) news (DOT) albasani.net>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> writes:
In article <Tx%4m.3495$ze1.352 (AT) news-server (DOT) bigpond.net.au>, Alex Bell
afjbell (AT) bigpond (DOT) net.au> wrote:

I have been using Liam Quinn's off line validator 'A Real Validator'
for years, but it seems that it is not enough. It did validate the
file, but I'll check into your comments.
If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs.

I'd like those -- do you have any idea what they're called?


Web Developer Bar extension

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer

I'm having trouble downloading it, and downloading the latest version of

Sea Monkey to try it out on before trying it on Firefox. I'll reboot and
try again later.

--
Regards, Alex

Alex Bell wrote:

Jonathan N. Little wrote:


Web Developer Bar extension

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer

I'm having trouble downloading it, and downloading the latest version of
Sea Monkey to try it out on before trying it on Firefox. I'll reboot and
try again later.

It's less than 200KB even on my poor dialup it is not a issue, how will
rebooting help?

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

Alex Bell wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:


Web Developer Bar extension

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer

I'm having trouble downloading it, and downloading the latest version
of Sea Monkey to try it out on before trying it on Firefox. I'll
reboot and try again later.


It's less than 200KB even on my poor dialup it is not a issue, how will
rebooting help?

Damned if I know, but if all else fails..

--
Regards, Alex

In article <h35agk$7ql$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org>, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art (AT) centralva (DOT) net> writes:

Michael Stemper wrote:
In article <doraymeRidThis-136FBC.10080409072009 (AT) news (DOT) albasani.net>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> writes:

If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs.

I'd like those -- do you have any idea what they're called?

Web Developer Bar extension

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer

It took a little doing, but I finally manged to pick it up. It has
a lot of cool features.

Unfortunately, its validator seems to require that you be on-line.

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
A preposition is something that you should never end a sentence with.

Michael Stemper wrote:

In article <h35agk$7ql$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org>, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art (AT) centralva (DOT) net> writes:
Michael Stemper wrote:
In article <doraymeRidThis-136FBC.10080409072009 (AT) news (DOT) albasani.net>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> writes:

If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs.
I'd like those -- do you have any idea what they're called?
Web Developer Bar extension

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer

It took a little doing, but I finally manged to pick it up. It has
a lot of cool features.

Unfortunately, its validator seems to require that you be on-line.

Yes, of course! The validator is the W3 validator, all the extension
does is prepare the page for transmission or upload...

If you want standalone validators to install on your local server...

http://validator.w3.org/docs/install.html
Installation Documentation for The W3C Markup Validation Service


http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/DOWNLOAD.html
Download and Install the CSS Validator

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

In article <h3pvkj$ksb$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org>, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art (AT) centralva (DOT) net> writes:

Michael Stemper wrote:
In article <h35agk$7ql$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org>, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art (AT) centralva (DOT) net> writes:
Michael Stemper wrote:
In article <doraymeRidThis-136FBC.10080409072009 (AT) news (DOT) albasani.net>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> writes:

If you get the FF browser, you can get extensions which, under Tools,
provides validators for both online and off line docs.
I'd like those -- do you have any idea what they're called?
Web Developer Bar extension

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer

It took a little doing, but I finally manged to pick it up. It has
a lot of cool features.

Unfortunately, its validator seems to require that you be on-line.


Yes, of course! The validator is the W3 validator, all the extension
does is prepare the page for transmission or upload...

See, I didn't properly understand the phrase "validators for both
online and off line docs." I thought that it meant it could validate
off-line. As soon as I tried to do that, I saw "Could not contact ..."
and realized what was going on.

But, like I said, it has lots of other cool features (most of which
I haven't even explored yet) to make it well worth keeping. So, thanks
for the tip.

If you want standalone validators to install on your local server...

http://validator.w3.org/docs/install.html
Installation Documentation for The W3C Markup Validation Service

I'll look into this.

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
Always use apostrophe's and "quotation marks" properly.