![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <6t9nlsF9v8kdU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>, Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote: [snip] Ah, thanks. Evidently he's been tinkering with it, and he's produced this updated arrangement with pixel-width left and right columns and unspecified-width center column: http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/ultimate-3-column-holy-grail-ems.htm Now that looks nice! I took a quick look at the code, but don't have time for detailed study - did anyone notice if there is anything in there that wouldn't work HTML 4.01 strict (other than obvious changes to closing tag format)? |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
David Stone wrote: In article <6t9nlsF9v8kdU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>, Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote: [snip] Ah, thanks. Evidently he's been tinkering with it, and he's produced this updated arrangement with pixel-width left and right columns and unspecified-width center column: http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/ultimate-3-column-holy-grail-ems.htm Now that looks nice! I took a quick look at the code, but don't have time for detailed study - did anyone notice if there is anything in there that wouldn't work HTML 4.01 strict (other than obvious changes to closing tag format)? It does work when delivered as HTML 4.01 strict. I've replaced my previous arrangement (this site uses the HTML 4.01 strict doctype) with the new CSS and the extra DIV nesting and it works very well, and fixes my original problem to boot. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Harlan Messinger wrote: David Stone wrote: In article <6t9nlsF9v8kdU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>, Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote: [snip] Ah, thanks. Evidently he's been tinkering with it, and he's produced this updated arrangement with pixel-width left and right columns and unspecified-width center column: http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/ultimate-3-column-holy-grail-ems.htm Now that looks nice! I took a quick look at the code, but don't have time for detailed study - did anyone notice if there is anything in there that wouldn't work HTML 4.01 strict (other than obvious changes to closing tag format)? It does work when delivered as HTML 4.01 strict. I've replaced my previous arrangement (this site uses the HTML 4.01 strict doctype) with the new CSS and the extra DIV nesting and it works very well, and fixes my original problem to boot. I hope you shoot the guy an email. When i'm done with my site, I will. Your right, I will. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |