On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:49:59 +0100, Der Kommissar
<der.kommissar (AT) invalid (DOT) invalid> wrote:
Quote:
I've been working on a site, in which I had to use tables for layout,
but I've used CSS to style the text and a few other things. http://www.cultuurnet.be/ |
[or <http://statik.be/misc/cultuurnet/>]
I don't see anything that requires tables for layout.
Quote:
The site seems to work as intended in virtually any browser |
Although I like the first impression the page makes, I don't like the
fixed width design of it all and certainly think the font size of your
main text is way too small to be able to read it comfortably, especially
those parts of text that are projected over a darkish picture. If I
enlarge the page to be able to read it comfortably, the fixed width design
makes the canvas too large for my viewport, thus a horizontal scrollbar.
But, hey, if you intended it this way.
Quote:
(according to browsercam), |
Although that site gives you a good first impression of how your pages
might look with various browsers, there is no thing better than the real
thing. You don't know what the minimum size for fonts is, for example,
that your visitor has set for his or her browser.
Quote:
except for IE 5.x/Win and Opera 6/Mac, where the huge text size breaks
the layout |
No, it is not the text size breaking the layout. It is a flaw in your
design. Create a liquid design
<http://www.google.com/search?q=liquid+design> and leave it up to your
visitor what the font size of the main text should be.
--
Weblog | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html>
Webontwerp | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html>
Zweefvliegen | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html>