![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I found this on a template, along with a warning that IE would ignore it: #content { max-width: 36em; } Assuming that the person who wrote this is much smarter than me, why this this a better method of limiting line-length than: #content p { width: 36em; } |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I found this on a template, along with a warning that IE would ignore it: #content { max-width: 36em; } |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
IE does not support CSS2. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Viken Karaguesian" <vikenkNO_SPAM (AT) NO_SPAMcomcast (DOT) net> wrote: IE does not support CSS2. Too sweeping a statement, IE supports some CSS2. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
What happens when the available display area is less than 36em wide? -- Okay, that's a good reason. Gotcha, thanks. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Spartanicus wrote: "Viken Karaguesian" <vikenkNO_SPAM (AT) NO_SPAMcomcast (DOT) net> wrote: IE does not support CSS2. Too sweeping a statement, IE supports some CSS2. Maybe I should have said "IE does not support CSS2 *well*" :>) Viken K. Viken, |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Too narrow a statement. IE doesn't support anything well. :-) (Actually, I rather like it for FTP, which it seems to handle flawlessly...) |

![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |