in comp.infosystems.
www.authoring.stylesheets, Don G wrote:
Quote:
You will have confusingly complex menu in 6 months, if you add one item
each month.
Why do you say it is complex? It is but a simple list. Aside from the
fact that some of the items are not links, how is it confusing? |
Hard to tell what is confusing, if the part that is confusing is not to
be taken account. It is 2 levels, but not consistant. It is not clear
that it is 2 levels, and especially it is not clear that home is link and
the others are headings.
Quote:
Yes, that would be nice, but I thought it would be better to always be
able to jump to any other page without having to go back. |
So, you are assumimg that your images are so uninteresting, that
almost nobody bothers to look at them? I don't think you are wrong
here... but your mother is most likely bigger target for this page than
thousand ciwas readers...
Quote:
It is confusing that I can't click Pre-Birth but can click Home, they
look and feel same.
You have a good point here. What I think I will do now is move most of
the formatting from the link tag to the list item tags, but keep the
hover on the links. This will help differentiate links from non-links. |
But it is not perfect. They should not look same.
Quote:
Do you think that would eliminate the confusion or should I do
something else to help differentiate the non-links? |
You need to make links look more links and text look more passive. It
doesn't help much to make them look different, if it is still unclear
which is link and which is text. There is convention that blue,
underlined text is link. That is best way to provide links today.
--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Utrecht, NL.