![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I used the Google Keyword analyzer for our wesite www.sawbarnwoodshop.com and now I am really confused. I have a list of 100 words that make absolutely no sense. It may have well of listed and, at, and i. I may have put the keywords in the meta tags incorrectly. Now I read that Google only use the actual text.....? |
|
It came up instead whit fragments. Instead of solid cedar chest it says 1. cedar 2. solid 3. chest etc. and just gets worse as it goes. I know the website isn't great..I've never done this before and it is by no means finshed it has a ways to go. I don't know what I'm doing wrong either. |
|
Any and all help will be greatly appreciated. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2008-05-17 10:42:54 -0400, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... (AT) central (DOT) net> said: R... (AT) sawbarnwoodshop (DOT) com wrote: I used the Google Keyword analyzer for our wesitewww.sawbarnwoodshop.com and now I am really confused. I have a list of 100 words that make absolutely no sense. *It may have well of listed and, at, and *i. I may have put the keywords in the meta tags incorrectly. *Now I read that Google only use the actual text.....? There have been so much SEO snake oil in the past with the practice of keyword stuffing that keywords are not of much use. The meta tag for keywords should be more useful to you as the designer that it is to a modern search engine. I typically put a few words there that I want to focus on in the page. Google will list individual words found on your site. But the search query and Google's magic pixie dust determine how the words play together in the grand scheme of things:-) It came up instead whit fragments. *Instead of solid cedar chest it says 1. cedar 2. solid 3. chest etc. and just gets worse as it goes. If you sign up for the Google webmaster tools you can see the phrases that Googlebot finds in external links to your site. -- Rob McAninchhttp://rock13.com/ |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
R... (AT) sawbarnwoodshop (DOT) com wrote: I used the Google Keyword analyzer for our wesitewww.sawbarnwoodshop.com and now I am really confused. I have a list of 100 words that make absolutely no sense. *It may have well of listed and, at, and *i. I may have put the keywords in the meta tags incorrectly. *Now I read that Google only use the actual text.....? There have been so much SEO snake oil in the past with the practice of keyword stuffing that keywords are not of much use. In fact if you google "cedar chest" the #1 listing only has 7 measly keywords. Many time the top ten have no keywords lists. Focus on the content of you website and interconnection with other relevant topics and the outcome will be more fruitful It came up instead whit fragments. *Instead of solid cedar chest it says 1. cedar 2. solid 3. chest etc. and just gets worse as it goes. I know the website isn't great..I've never done this before and it is by no means finshed it has a ways to go. I don't know what I'm doing wrong either. Not bad. Your biggest error is however is that everything is absolutely positioned and assumes a browser width of 900px! View it in another browser other than IE and enlarge the text a bit (CTRL +). I think you will be startled with what happens. Any and all help will be greatly appreciated. Goggle, "liquid layout" And checkout the tutorials atwww.htmldog.comand get started on the right foot. -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com |
|
website and interconnection with other relevant topics and the outcome will be more fruitful} |
|
positioned and assumes a browser width of 900px} |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2008-05-17 10:42:54 -0400, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... (AT) central (DOT) net said: R... (AT) sawbarnwoodshop (DOT) com wrote: I used the Google Keyword analyzer for our wesitewww.sawbarnwoodshop.com and now I am really confused. I have a list of 100 words that make absolutely no sense. It may have well of listed and, at, and i. I may have put the keywords in the meta tags incorrectly. Now I read that Google only use the actual text.....? There have been so much SEO snake oil in the past with the practice of keyword stuffing that keywords are not of much use. The meta tag for keywords should be more useful to you as the designer that it is to a modern search engine. I typically put a few words there that I want to focus on in the page. Google will list individual words found on your site. But the search query and Google's magic pixie dust determine how the words play together in the grand scheme of things:-) It came up instead whit fragments. Instead of solid cedar chest it says 1. cedar 2. solid 3. chest etc. and just gets worse as it goes. If you sign up for the Google webmaster tools you can see the phrases that Googlebot finds in external links to your site. -- Rob McAninchhttp://rock13.com/ |
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
On May 17, 9:42 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... (AT) central (DOT) net> wrote: Not bad. Your biggest error is however is that everything is absolutely positioned and assumes a browser width of 900px! View it in another browser other than IE and enlarge the text a bit (CTRL +). I think you will be startled with what happens. I've only seen it on our neighbors computer and she's using Firefox/ Mozilla? I know that it's new to her and she has her resolution changed (big letters) I didn't realize that would affect the web pages too. I did check with people that I notified about the web page it I first published it...asked questions about what colors they see, if it loaded ok, etc. |
|
You wrote: {Focus on the content of you website and interconnection with other relevant topics and the outcome will be more fruitful} Interconnection with other relevant topics??? I hate to sound stupid....however I don't get this......I'm thinking the website needs to 'say' more about our furniture and the cedar blah, blah,,, Other relevant topics? |
|
You wrote: {everything is absolutely positioned and assumes a browser width of 900px} I'm guessing you mean the browser width on the moniter is 900 pixels wide? Which would mean if someone is using one with only say 700 pixels wide they would have to scroll left to right? Which I actually hate doing myself. I've tried not do the same things which I don't like. |
|
I'll check the 'liquid layout' and the htmldog site. I may have already been to that one ...there are soooo many! |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
R... (AT) sawbarnwoodshop (DOT) com wrote: On May 17, 9:42 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... (AT) central (DOT) net> wrote: Not bad. Your biggest error is however is that everything is absolutely positioned and assumes a browser width of 900px! View it in another browser other than IE and enlarge the text a bit (CTRL +). I think you will be startled with what happens. I've only seen it on our neighbors computer and she's using Firefox/ Mozilla? *I know that it's new to her and she has her resolution changed (big letters) I didn't realize that would affect the web pages too. *I did check with people that I notified about the web page it I first published it...asked questions about what colors they see, if it loaded ok, etc. You know you can install Firefox on you own computer. http://www.mozilla.com http:/www.opera.com There is no law against having more than one browser. In fact I have 16, but you only need 2 or 3, Firefox and IE would be enough. You wrote: {Focus on the content of you website and interconnection with other relevant topics and the outcome will be more fruitful} Interconnection with other relevant topics??? *I hate to sound stupid....however I don't get this......I'm thinking the website needs to 'say' more about our furniture and the cedar blah, blah,,, Other relevant topics? Sure, more content is always good. Just don't put it all on one page. Linking to other related resources. Your business is with Cedar Chests there may be other websites dealing with fine crafted furniture, Hope chest collecting, furniture makers associations, clubs etc. You wrote: {everything is absolutely positioned and assumes a browser width of 900px} I'm guessing you mean the browser width on the moniter is 900 pixels wide? *Which would mean if someone is using one with only say 700 pixels wide they would have to scroll left to right? *Which I actually hate doing myself. *I've tried not do the same things which I don't like. Exactly. My monitor's resolution never equals my browser window, I alway have more than one application running at once. I'll check the 'liquid layout' and the htmldog site. I may have already been to that one ...there are soooo many! It will help. -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |