Re: worst site ever?

In article <kjbw190eryga.1dwiyrbi1wnm5$.dlg (AT) 40tude (DOT) net>,
member (AT) newsguy (DOT) com says...

http://www.hosanna1.com/

Overloaded with background images galore but no marquee!

Did you see her other sites?

http://www.3ahomebusiness.biz/

http://www.aalf.ws/

In article <MPG.253d1c984eba2fd2989684 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org>, SAZ <saz1958@!nospammersexcite.com> wrote:

In article <kjbw190eryga.1dwiyrbi1wnm5$.dlg (AT) 40tude (DOT) net>,
member (AT) newsguy (DOT) com says...

http://www.hosanna1.com/

Overloaded with background images galore but no marquee!

Did you see her other sites?

http://www.3ahomebusiness.biz/

http://www.aalf.ws/

"The most beautiful pages on the web." What an astonishing capacity for
self-delusion.

"SAZ" <saz1958@!nospammersexcite.com> wrote

In article <kjbw190eryga.1dwiyrbi1wnm5$.dlg (AT) 40tude (DOT) net>,
member (AT) newsguy (DOT) com says...

http://www.hosanna1.com/

Overloaded with background images galore but no marquee!

Did you see her other sites?

http://www.3ahomebusiness.biz/

http://www.aalf.ws/

She's got a special talent. Actually I wonder if she does have some kind of
psychological abnormality. They do look like the product of a diseased mind.

Amusingly, she's prefixed most of her page titles with "AAAA" etc, like
she's wanting to get to the top of the Yellow Pages. Actually....

--
+mrcakey
www.twitter.com/mrcakey

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:52:23 GMT, Doug Miller wrote:

In article SAZ wrote:
In article member (AT) newsguy (DOT) com says...

http://www.hosanna1.com/

Overloaded with background images galore but no marquee!

Did you see her other sites?

http://www.3ahomebusiness.biz/

http://www.aalf.ws/

"The most beautiful pages on the web." What an astonishing capacity for
self-delusion.

Made my eyes bleed ...

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <MPG.253d1c984eba2fd2989684 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org>, SAZ <saz1958@!nospammersexcite.com> wrote:
In article <kjbw190eryga.1dwiyrbi1wnm5$.dlg (AT) 40tude (DOT) net>,
member (AT) newsguy (DOT) com says...
http://www.hosanna1.com/

Overloaded with background images galore but no marquee!
Did you see her other sites?

http://www.3ahomebusiness.biz/

http://www.aalf.ws/

"The most beautiful pages on the web." What an astonishing capacity for
self-delusion.

Wow, and after all those years where the science finally prevailed:
"smoking can kill you", only to discover that this is all a lie. Who
would have guessed! Hey the Earth is really flat too!

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

In article <BeednVSr6-wS30PXnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d (AT) earthlink (DOT) com>,
"Wings" <glenn61 (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote:

What's the big deal? She's having fun. Coders fit on a bell curve like
everything else - from bad to good. It doesn't mean they shouldn't be doing
it. I'm a poor coder myself, but if my site looks the way I want it to look,
who should give a fraps arse? Many coders crapping about bad sites are
really saying "look how great I am!" It gets soooooo tiresome.

Does it now? Are they now? And you cannot hear any other message?

What is tiresome is the persistent misunderstanding that if a site looks
ok to one or two people, especially the author, then it is OK.

Well, it is not OK at all. The very biggest companies sometimes have
this attitude and they regard any complaint about their site as
something for that particular user to address on his or her particular
machine, with their assistance sometimes (do this and that and the other
thing to your prefs or controls and it will be OK, their customer
service or techs will tell the complainer).

But the real fault is with the machinery behind their sites, they will,
tweak the machinery in an ad hoc way to address every concern they come
across that they cannot fob off as an individual unlikely case. And
build a nightmare-to-maintain site that seems to ignorant managers to
justifies their department's pay.

--
dorayme

"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote

In article <BeednVSr6-wS30PXnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d (AT) earthlink (DOT) com>,
"Wings" <glenn61 (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote:


What's the big deal? She's having fun. Coders fit on a bell curve like
everything else - from bad to good. It doesn't mean they shouldn't be
doing
it. I'm a poor coder myself, but if my site looks the way I want it to
look,
who should give a fraps arse? Many coders crapping about bad sites are
really saying "look how great I am!" It gets soooooo tiresome.


Does it now? Are they now? And you cannot hear any other message?

What is tiresome is the persistent misunderstanding that if a site looks
ok to one or two people, especially the author, then it is OK.

Well, it is not OK at all. The very biggest companies sometimes have
this attitude and they regard any complaint about their site as
something for that particular user to address on his or her particular
machine, with their assistance sometimes (do this and that and the other
thing to your prefs or controls and it will be OK, their customer
service or techs will tell the complainer).

But the real fault is with the machinery behind their sites, they will,
tweak the machinery in an ad hoc way to address every concern they come
across that they cannot fob off as an individual unlikely case. And
build a nightmare-to-maintain site that seems to ignorant managers to
justifies their department's pay.

--
dorayme

I guess I'm pretty wimpy. You make sense also. (grin) Yes, for commercial
sites I agree 100%.