Re: UTF-8 vs. iso-8859-1

Toby Inkster <usenet200507 (AT) tobyinkster (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

The advantage of UTF-8 (which is a concrete representation of the more
abstract "Unicode" set of characters) is that it has vastly more
characters than ISO-8859-1.

That is true, but the repertoire of characters that you can use in an UTF-8
encoded HTML document is exactly the same the one you can use in an ISO-
8859-1 encoded document, namely UCS, the Universal Character Set, also
known as the Unicode character set. The reason is that you can use
character references like 〹 to overcome the limitations of the
encoding.

UTF-8 becomes advantageous with respect to ISO-8859-1 if you use _many_
characters outside the ISO-8859-1 repertoire.

The advantage of ISO-8859-1 is that is enjoys slightly wider support
than UTF-8.

Besides, ISO-8859-1 is more compact for most West European languages:
it uses one octet per character, whereas UTF-8 uses two octets for any
character in the upper half of the ISO-8859-1 repertoire.

--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Pages about Web authoring: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www.html