Re: non-valid XHTML DTD

spam (AT) raf256 (DOT) com news:Xns9559A839A8B64raf256com (AT) 213 (DOT) 180.128.20

I'm rewritting some older pages. New pages I write in HTML, so I declare:
What type of W3C DTD is most "easy" or "bad html style" tollerable?

Hmm, I think this can be answare to my own question:

http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html

but perhaps some additional sugestions?


--
~~~~=~~~~l_;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_|\___J \____, Pozdrawiam, moje www, C++, kontakt, itd.:
X-( ssn256 ) Rafal Maj Raf256 - http://www.raf256.com/me-news/
,"-------------" (strona w budowie)