Re: iframe question

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:49:00 -0500, richard <I.dont.care (AT) do (DOT) you> wrote:

All I want to know why is why is the code not working in FF?

Because you, Richard Bullis The Stupid, are simply too damn pig-fucking
ignorant to even begin to understand HTML.

Out of all the arrogant tosspot truck-drivers posting to Usenet, you
make even Conor look like a genius.

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:39:33 GMT
Andy Dingley scribed:

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:49:00 -0500, richard <I.dont.care (AT) do (DOT) you> wrote:

All I want to know why is why is the code not working in FF?

Because you, Richard Bullis The Stupid, are simply too damn pig-fucking
ignorant to even begin to understand HTML.

Out of all the arrogant tosspot truck-drivers posting to Usenet, you
make even Conor look like a genius.

Now now... Perhaps he's one of those eccentrics who are really smart in
some areas but obfuscate it by a show of confusion in others.

--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.

In article <Xns9A24D9DA6A535nanopandaneredbojias (AT) 85 (DOT) 214.90.236>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:39:33 GMT
Andy Dingley scribed:

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:49:00 -0500, richard <I.dont.care (AT) do (DOT) you> wrote:

All I want to know why is why is the code not working in FF?

Because you, Richard Bullis The Stupid, are simply too damn pig-fucking
ignorant to even begin to understand HTML.

Out of all the arrogant tosspot truck-drivers posting to Usenet, you
make even Conor look like a genius.

Now now... Perhaps he's one of those eccentrics who are really smart in
some areas but obfuscate it by a show of confusion in others.

A perfectly good dressing down by AD deserves better than this,
Boji. Why on earth would someone want to obfuscate their
smartness in one area by showing confusion in another? If they
were smart, they would either not obfuscate in any area or they
would obfuscate *in* the area they are trying to hide their
cleverness or they would obfuscate for an entirely different
purpose.

I think I know why you are so confused about this but I cannot
confirm it until you send me that scoop, that sample of your
brain for tests.

--
dorayme

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:09:08
GMT dorayme scribed:

All I want to know why is why is the code not working in FF?

Because you, Richard Bullis The Stupid, are simply too damn
pig-fucking ignorant to even begin to understand HTML.

Out of all the arrogant tosspot truck-drivers posting to Usenet,
you make even Conor look like a genius.

Now now... Perhaps he's one of those eccentrics who are really smart
in some areas but obfuscate it by a show of confusion in others.

A perfectly good dressing down by AD deserves better than this,
Boji. Why on earth would someone want to obfuscate their
smartness in one area by showing confusion in another? If they
were smart, they would either not obfuscate in any area or they
would obfuscate *in* the area they are trying to hide their
cleverness or they would obfuscate for an entirely different
purpose.

I think I know why you are so confused about this but I cannot
confirm it until you send me that scoop, that sample of your
brain for tests.

You are so critical. And btw, your post is seriously off-topic.

--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.

In article <Xns9A2572E01321nanopandaneredbojias (AT) 85 (DOT) 214.90.236>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:09:08
GMT dorayme scribed:

All I want to know why is why is the code not working in FF?

Because you, Richard Bullis The Stupid, are simply too damn
pig-fucking ignorant to even begin to understand HTML.

Out of all the arrogant tosspot truck-drivers posting to Usenet,
you make even Conor look like a genius.

Now now... Perhaps he's one of those eccentrics who are really smart
in some areas but obfuscate it by a show of confusion in others.

A perfectly good dressing down by AD deserves better than this,
Boji. Why on earth would someone want to obfuscate their
smartness in one area by showing confusion in another? If they
were smart, they would either not obfuscate in any area or they
would obfuscate *in* the area they are trying to hide their
cleverness or they would obfuscate for an entirely different
purpose.

I think I know why you are so confused about this but I cannot
confirm it until you send me that scoop, that sample of your
brain for tests.

You are so critical. And btw, your post is seriously off-topic.

I know. But when I have qualms about it - and I do - I dismiss
them where you are concerned because of your sexist nonsense and
because of your absolute wilfullness in failing to insert a
sharpened teaspoon through your ear and getting me that scoop I
need for testing.

You see, you are interesting to me not because you make
occasional mistakes - who doesn't? No, it is because of a
systematic pattern that makes me think you are actually from a
planet that my own planet has been INVESTIGATING. I cannot say
any more at this stage.

--
dorayme

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:55:23
GMT dorayme scribed:

A perfectly good dressing down by AD deserves better than this,
Boji. Why on earth would someone want to obfuscate their
smartness in one area by showing confusion in another? If they
were smart, they would either not obfuscate in any area or they
would obfuscate *in* the area they are trying to hide their
cleverness or they would obfuscate for an entirely different
purpose.

I think I know why you are so confused about this but I cannot
confirm it until you send me that scoop, that sample of your
brain for tests.

You are so critical. And btw, your post is seriously off-topic.

I know. But when I have qualms about it - and I do - I dismiss
them where you are concerned because of your sexist nonsense and
because of your absolute wilfullness in failing to insert a
sharpened teaspoon through your ear and getting me that scoop I
need for testing.

I'm not a sexist, I'm a realistic. Sure, sometimes I joke around and if
women were advanced enough to have a well-developed sense of humor, they
would realize it. As it is, one must give them some latitude.

You see, you are interesting to me not because you make
occasional mistakes - who doesn't? No, it is because of a
systematic pattern that makes me think you are actually from a
planet that my own planet has been INVESTIGATING. I cannot say
any more at this stage.

Ahh, I used to be an adamant science-fiction buff in my younger days.
For years, the only fiction is read was sf. Yesterday, I re-watched
"Forbidden Planet" (-seen it like 100 times) and still enjoyed it after
all this time.

Anyway, my planet is infested with inimical life-forms that don't seem to
do it much good at all. Any ideas for a cure?

--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.

In article <Xns9A25B6543CECnanopandaneredbojias (AT) 194 (DOT) 177.96.78>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Anyway, my planet is infested with inimical life-forms that don't seem to
do it much good at all. Any ideas for a cure?

I would need to know more about it. But please do not send me
details unless you accompany them with a small contribution in
$US. I am actually designing a rat trap at the moment, it might
be able to be adapted for you. I saw a most wonderfully clever
concept in the local hardware shop for a mouse trap (it captures
them unhurt rather than kills them). So... I have been thinking a
bit about these matters.

--
dorayme

On 14 Jan, 04:24, Neredbojias <monstersquas... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Because you, Richard Bullis The Stupid, are simply too damn pig-fucking
ignorant to even begin to understand HTML.

Now now... Perhaps he's one of those eccentrics who are really smart in
some areas but obfuscate it by a show of confusion in others.

No, he's just _really_ stupid. We've tried. We've all tried. It really
is like casting pearls before swine.

Richard Bullis is just what happens when you let twins marry:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7182817.stm

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:21:25
GMT Andy Dingley scribed:

On 14 Jan, 04:24, Neredbojias <monstersquas... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Because you, Richard Bullis The Stupid, are simply too damn
pig-fucking ignorant to even begin to understand HTML.

Now now... Perhaps he's one of those eccentrics who are really smart
in some areas but obfuscate it by a show of confusion in others.

No, he's just _really_ stupid. We've tried. We've all tried. It really
is like casting pearls before swine.

Richard Bullis is just what happens when you let twins marry:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7182817.stm

Geez, that article's like...scary. I don't think I want to know any
more.

--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:24:43
GMT dorayme scribed:

In article <Xns9A25B6543CECnanopandaneredbojias (AT) 194 (DOT) 177.96.78>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

Anyway, my planet is infested with inimical life-forms that don't
seem to do it much good at all. Any ideas for a cure?

I would need to know more about it. But please do not send me
details unless you accompany them with a small contribution in
$US. I am actually designing a rat trap at the moment, it might
be able to be adapted for you. I saw a most wonderfully clever
concept in the local hardware shop for a mouse trap (it captures
them unhurt rather than kills them).

Uh huh. One should always be kind to the critters one exterminates.

So... I have been thinking a
bit about these matters.

Oooh, ho ho ho... Don't think - you might get into trouble...

--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.