![]() | |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Oct 26, 2:35*pm, Adrienne Boswell wrote: only I still don't understand the problem with "&". Is it better to change them to "&"? Hey - hey - hey! Don't spoil my quoted ampersand!! I wrote "&"! |
|
Yes, always escape ampersand. * I wonder if you never get a mess with a recursive problem like ( ( ( & ) amp; ) amp; ) amp; |
|
In my authoring, I always use the whole word "and" unless the ampersand is a part of a company's name, like Ben & Jerry's. which authoring? |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Oct 26, 2:35*pm, Adrienne Boswell <arb... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: only I still don't understand the problem with "&". Is it better to change them to "&"? Hey - hey - hey! Don't spoil my quoted ampersand!! I wrote "&"! |
|
Yes, always escape ampersand. * I wonder if you never get a mess with a recursive problem like ( ( ( & ) amp; ) amp; ) amp; |
I _might_ have seen|
In my authoring, I always use the whole word "and" unless the ampersand i s a part of a company's name, like Ben & Jerry's. which authoring? |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
It showed up for me as a single ampersand character between two quotation marks. * Yes, always escape ampersand. * I wonder if you never get a mess with a recursive problem like ( ( ( & ) amp; ) amp; ) amp; Just so, we see an example of that here. *You wrote & but I only saw & - had you escaped the first ampersand (&mp I _might_ have seenit that way (no guarantee because you're using Google Groups). |
|
which authoring? HTML authoring. * |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |